copticruiser
You asked to be informed “what is not Catholic about Michael Voris”, and I directed you to Joe Hargrave’s videos, but I overlooked your stated difficulty in watching videos because of a slow Internet connection. I apologise for missing that point.
If you can receive only the audio, that would be sufficient for you to understand the argument that Joe Hargrave is making.
My understanding of his argument is, in a nutshell, like this:
Michael Voris recognises that there is a crisis in the Church, but fails to understand the source of the crisis.
For example, he rails against “ecuмenism”, because he rightly points out that it is not Catholic, but, at the same time, he fails to understand that that same “ecuмenism” is being promoted from the very top, ie: previously from John Paul II, and now from Benedict XVI.
This mismatch is either through ignorance on the part of Voris (in which case he shows himself to be a fool), or it is with knowledge of the facts (in which case Voris is a knave).
Either way, Voris serves as a lightning conductor, to attract the attention of traditional Catholics and then to divert their criticism away from where it should properly be directed.
I hope that helps to explain what this is about.