One of the articles which caused Fr. Kramer to completely change his position from sede vacante to una cuм papa nostro Benedicto makes many valid points and the reader is overwhelmingly compelled to accept that the resignation of Pope Benedict was not valid. The original article is in Spanish and if you cannot read Spanish it is worth getting out your google translator. The article claims that just as a woman coerced to say I do and freely given her marriage is still invalid just as the papacy resignation would be. Then it cites important evidence that Benefict was forced to resign. Most compelling of all is the intentional error in his Latin which Benedict would have known and been able to correct. According the article there is a rule that if the Latin has errors the docuмent is not valid and cites examples. It then claims that even if you claim this is not correct then the error is still intentional and still sufficient evidence that the resignation of Benedict is not valid. I must admit that I was baffled when I read this a month ago and when seeing Fr. Kramer declare sede vacante sent it to him to get his opinion. Within little time he was saying una cuм papa nostro Bendicto and before that he had been asserting that Pope Benedict's resignation was valid. If the article can legitimately be refuted is one thing. If not then we have a problem. You will want to translate this or read it.

http://www.ultimostiempos.org/7-noticias/150-bxvi

Father Kramer would do well to realize that the heresies taught by Francis I were also taught by Benedict XVI et al.

I totally agree. The whole thing is like a bad joke which does nothing but help the unknowing into knowing less and being confused more.