CathInfo.com

Logic 101

You are making a claim. You don’t challenge your opponent to prove the contrary before first providing evidence to support your claim.

A link to a website by an unknown person
with questionable credentials (“Dr” William G. von Peters is a world prominent physician practicing Alternative and Oriental Medicine, writer and educator) and a lack of formal training in the academic field he is critiquing does not establish a claim.

I could have sufficed with a “Ha! Good one” and that would have been more than enough.

“Possibly” referring to something that may or may not be, the “Douay too” referring to the subject of discussion which is willful textual corruption. This constitutes a claim.

You left the web link as a supporting piece of evidence to your post which clearly implied the possibility of “tampering” in the Douay Bible.

Lastly, no the same cannot be said about any web owner posting any information. Some websites are run by professionals, academics, scholars, etc that have credence to their claims by virtue of authority, references, and the ability to prove their claims directly by way of their experience.