The Modernist crooks don't care if anyone notices that they eliminated a proposition here and there. They do what they want and have done what they want since V2 - being in charge means that they answer only to each other. Anyone who wants to present any opposition is met with a complete non-acknowledgement of their existence, that's the method they've used to deal with nearly all oppositions since V2. Rahner was a crook too, what you think is intellectual honesty has diabolical motives.
As Pope St. Pius X explains....
"Further, none is more skillful, none more astute than they, in the employment of a thousand noxious arts; for they double the parts of rationalist and Catholic, and this so craftily that they easily lead the unwary into error; and since audacity is their chief characteristic, there is no conclusion of any kind from which they shrink or which they do not thrust forward with pertinacity and assurance." - Pascendi
God commands us to be just. Not all modernists are intellectually dishonest in so far as their analyses of history and objective reality are concerned.
Rahner was a heretic, he died as such(as far as we know), and is now being severely judged; there is no doubt. Nonetheless he was a scholar and an academic. I have not seen anything in his writings, from a purely factual basis, that leads me to conclude that he actively suppressed or tampered with information in his editing or writing.
Topic: Was the Denzinger tampered with? (Read 4729 times)