Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

Author Topic: Was the Denzinger tampered with?  (Read 3489 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Carissima

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 782
  • Reputation: +569/-229
  • Gender: Female
Re: Was the Denzinger tampered with?
« Reply #45 on: August 27, 2021, 11:57:40 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Marion on August 27, 2021, 08:21:46 AM
    The original Douay-Rheims Bible in old English is available on archive.org:

    1610 A.D. Douay Old Testament, 1582 A.D. Rheims New Testament

    Scroll down for download links (PDF, PDF with text, ...)
    Yes, thank you! 
    Logged

    Offline bodeens

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1513
    • Reputation: +804/-160
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Was the Denzinger tampered with?
    « Reply #46 on: November 20, 2021, 11:05:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Does anyone have a link to the most recent Denzinger before Rahner started editing it? PDF or TXT or a link is fine.
    Logged
    Regard all of my posts as unfounded slander, heresy, theologically specious etc
    I accept Church teaching on Implicit Baptism of Desire.
    Francis is Pope.
    NO is a good Mass.
    Not an ironic sig.

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12464
    • Reputation: +8255/-1572
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Was the Denzinger tampered with?
    « Reply #47 on: November 20, 2021, 11:59:01 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Logged

    Offline TradMan80

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 77
    • Reputation: +41/-42
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Was the Denzinger tampered with?
    « Reply #48 on: November 21, 2021, 12:35:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • I have the 30th Edition of Denzinger with a corrigenda and, as far as I'm concerned, most or all Trads use this edition even though it has Karl Rahner's name in it.

    If anyone claims that this edition of Denzinger is bad or corrupted, then can they please cite a few specifics? Again, it's not that I don't believe them it's just that I would like a few specifics. We all know that subsequent editions of Denzinger (post 1954;1957) omitted Pope Pius IX's "Quanta Cura" for obvious reasons. 

    Again, can anyone list a few specifics which show the 30th edition of Denzinger is either bad or corrupted? Thanks.  
    Logged
    Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
    « previous next »