I have been told that if God does not will someone to become a priest, then it will not happen. Fair enough. But what about the many tens of thousands of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ priests and the thousands of paedos who are priests? Do they have a vocation? Seems so, because they are ordained. God willed this?
God, The First Mover, wills all things either by His positive or permissive will, i.e., nothing happens that God did not either will to happen or allow to happen. In that sense, God wills (thought at least in modern English it's probably better to understand that He ALLOWS) bad men to become priests.
People need to see that the judgements of the church are the judgments of MAN.
Man can err. God does not know error. Man is steeped in error.
Well, as a syllogism this would read that the Church can err, which is certainly false. The "judgements" of the Church on faith and morals are infallible, though I'm not really sure what you mean by judgements. A superior can ordain an unworthy man, but that is not a "judgement" of the Church.
There are so many bad priests, in fact a good one is rare. Their vocation was a desire, that began in themselves, and which was approved by man.
Man found worth in the desire of a potential priest, and ordained him.
A priest (period) is rare. Most clerics in the N.O. have doubt surrounding their ordination, which practically renders them non-priests anyways. If they weren't ordained, they didn't have a vocation.
To deny someone the possibility of accomplishing their desire to be a religious is to play God.
No, it's not, because a vocation is God's plan for that person's state in life. It is not necessarily that person's desire.
If they turned out to be a paedo or a homo, then it was God's will that they not be priests.
It is certainly still God's will. But again, considering the doubts surrounding N.O. priests, it's questionable whether they are fulfilling a vocation for the priesthood in the first place.
But if they were not these things, and if they had the faith and were not a liberal, who is to say that they dont have a vocation? God then desires that they become religious if they would serve him by doing so.
In better times, bishops and those in charge of seminaries were trained and prayed to identify vocations. Combined with God's grace moving them and the potential priest, "failed" vocations were not common.
The way it is now is non-homos and non-childmolesters and conservatives are denied entry to religious life on the judgements of men. Their judgments are flawed, their church is steeped in chaos and corruption. It is not for these corrupt heretical men to decide who should and should not be priests, that should be up to the individual man who is a traditionalist.
Well, really, it's up to God. If God wills a man to be a priest then you can take it to the bank. Being "conservative and non homo" does not mean you have a vocation.
Personal gripe.
Did the Novus Ordo seminary reject you? Good. If you do have a vocation to the priesthood, you won't fulfill it there.