Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7

Author Topic: Visual map of all branches of Sedevacantism - by Fr Chazal  (Read 5603 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Centroamerica

Re: Visual map of all branches of Sedevacantism - by Fr Chazal
« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2018, 10:11:14 AM »
Quote from: Cantarella on March 17, 2018, 09:23:09 AM
You are correct that St. Benedict Center is NOT sedevacantist.
Aren't they full Novus Ordo and hosted by the new-diocese?
Logged

Offline cathman7

Re: Visual map of all branches of Sedevacantism - by Fr Chazal
« Reply #6 on: March 17, 2018, 10:11:18 AM »
Quote from: Cantarella on March 17, 2018, 09:36:51 AM
I do not see the sedeprivationist "Instituto Mater Boni Consilii" in Italy.
It is referred to under Bishop Stuyvert but not as its own branch.
Logged

Offline Centroamerica

Re: Visual map of all branches of Sedevacantism - by Fr Chazal
« Reply #7 on: March 17, 2018, 10:16:10 AM »
That Brazilian National Church had nothing to do with sedevacantists. It has nothing to do with the Traditional Catholic movement at all. Putting it in this list is like putting the schismatic Polish Catholic Church on this list or the Old Catholics on this list.  (Some out there sedevacantists might have gotten their episcopal lineage from them, but the same could be said of the Old Catholics).
Logged

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Visual map of all branches of Sedevacantism - by Fr Chazal
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2018, 10:53:28 AM »
Quote
Aren't they (St Benedict Center) full Novus Ordo and hosted by the new-diocese?
Yes and no.  Depends which group you're talking about (there used to be 3).  All have come under the diocese in the last few decades but they do still think of themselves (falsely) as 'trads' because they prefer the latin mass.
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Visual map of all branches of Sedevacantism - by Fr Chazal
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2018, 01:18:16 PM »
Yeah, I don't really care for this and its breakdowns.  Also, it lists specific groups and people in here rather than just limiting itself to positions.

One could put together an even more complex breakdown of sedeplenists.

I would not use Conclavist and Non-Conclavist as the top-level distinction, but I guess you could carve it up in different ways.  Most Sedevacantists don't think of the Conclavist issue, but that comes as a consequence of their core position and is little more than an idle afterthought to most of them.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
« previous next »