And if we read further, Bernardino of Siena was a popular itinerant preacher who did not shirk from calling out the corruption of his time. Decades before Savanarola's bonfires of the vanities, St. Bernardino was already attracting crowds by torching piles of what he preached to be objects of sin. In his preaching, he irked the wrong people: usurers, sodomites, those profiting from gambling, vendors of luxury goods, etc., i.e., the worldly constituents of those who agitated in Rome against him.
Point being, there are charges of heresy on solid theological grounds, and then there are charges of heresy that serve ulterior motives. The enemies of the Faith gleefully know that big-boy infighting at the macro level has the convenient side-effect of sowing insidious latent doubt at the little-guy micro level too, even in the minutiae of sol justitiae vs. sol invictus, whether in the 15th century or the 21st century.
Hermeticism and heliocentrism has been a thorn in the side of the Church for centuries.So despite his acts of holiness, the minutiae of words matter.
Quoting again:
Pope Pius XI, Rite expiatis (# 6), April 30, 1926: “…heresies gradually arose and grew in the vineyard of the Lord, propagated either by open heretics or by sly deceivers who, because they professed a certain austerity of life and gave a false appearance of virtue and piety, easily led weak and simple souls astray.”[143]
To be clear: I have never declared that V is a Mason.I have pointed out that he is using phrases that most Catholics don't recognizebut are very well known calling cards to Masons, Wiccans, Rosicrucians, Satanists, New Age Luciferians...etc.He is using the term they use for their god Lucifer andthe term they use to close their communications and spells.And then I asked the question, WHY?This is in accordance with the directives of Popes Pius VI and XI which I docuмented earlier in this thread.
Again:
Pope Pius VI, Bull “Auctorem fidei," August 28, 1794: “[The Ancient Doctors] knew the capacity of innovators in the art of deception. In order not to shock the ears of Catholics, they sought to hide the subtleties… by the use of seemingly innocuous words such as would allow them to insinuate error into souls in the most gentle manner. Once the truth had been compromised, they could, by means of slight changes or additions in phraseology, distort the confession of the faith which is necessary for our salvation, and lead the faithful by subtle errors to their eternal damnation.”
"In order to expose such snares, something which becomes necessary with a certain frequency in every century, no other method is required than the following:WHENEVER IT BECOMES NECESSARY TO EXPOSE STATEMENTS WHICH DISGUISE SOME SUSPECTED ERROR OR DANGER UNDER THE VEIL OF AMBIGUITY, ONE MUST DENOUNCE THE PERVERSE MEANING UNDER WHICH THE ERROR OPPOSED TO CATHOLIC TRUTH IS CAMOUFLAGED.”
So red flags are to be called out even if they aren't proof.
There is no reason for Vigano to use such phrases.
What we do have 100% undeniable proof of, however
is that Vigano LIED
to cover for Trump's responsibility as the overseer of the pandemic farce and the
Father of the Vaccine.
Plus he continues to tell people Trump is the enemy of the WEF and Gates
when it is obvious to anyone who will take off their "hero goggles"
for just a moment and notice that
they are in fact implementing the same objectives.
Plus his promotion of ecuмenical Zionist prayer rallies.
That is undeniable.