I think the suspicions about +Vigano are not based solely about him referring to Our Lord as Sol Invictus, the same title used by satanists and Freemasons. That standing alone could be overlooked. Put together with his ecuмenical support in the Trump rallies, and renew America gatherings, referring to heretics, jews, and those who oppose the "deep state" as the "children of light" or " those aligned with God", is very disturbing coming from a prince of the church whose duty it is to convert souls to the true faith and not coddle and support them in their errors.
Yes, those of us who have concerns understand this. I agree: if this was the only thing, it could be overlooked. But it is not.
When Michael Matt nixed Vigano from his Unite the Novus Ordo Clans, I saw that as a very positive turn and, as a result, I put these other concerns on the back burner
temporarily; however, his message at the most recent "Reawaken America Tour" made me take another look at them (as well as consider others I had not considered before...this being one).
To PV's point, which is a valid point, I do not know for sure whether this particular title has ever been used/approved by the Church, but there is
no evidence for it. And no one who is saying it has been used/approved by the Church has been able to prove that it has. All they do is point to other titles that have "Sol" in them as proof. Again,
if this were the only issue, we could let it go (at least I could), but it's not (at least for me).