It boils down to this every time: R&R needs dogmatic Sedevacantism as a strawman. Thankfully Meg acknowledges in her last couple of sentences what Sedes always say, that either you accept NOM or Sedevacante. Perhaps all RnRs here should read her post here. I'm glad she finally sees the issue as I do.
It's worth me making a distinction that her language and phrasing of these issues is incorrect but that her basic idea of the dualistic situation between the counterfeit VII sect and Tradition is correct and that RnR should examine this position more carefully. I wholeheartedly agree with her prescription that "Tradition will never return to the conciliar church". Excellent phrasing Meg, I couldn't agree more.
What does holiness of life and virtue mean to sedevacantists? Do they believe that the highest virtue is to proclaim that the See of Rome is vacant? It seems so. Can they get to Heaven upon this one supposed all-consuming virtue of theirs?
Discussion of membership in the Church goes in the Feeneyism Ghetto
