Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6

Author Topic: Vigano on Benedict's Death?  (Read 3415 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 2Vermont

Vigano on Benedict's Death?
« on: January 03, 2023, 07:41:54 PM »
Has Vigano written anything about Benedict's death?
Logged

Offline Nadir

Re: Vigano on Benedict's Death?
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2023, 08:51:24 PM »
Actually, when I saw the title of your thread, 2V, I was looking forward to reading  it. Just now I read the ?. Oh, the importance of small detail!
Logged

Offline Incredulous

Re: Vigano on Benedict's Death?
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2023, 10:34:27 PM »

:popcorn:


              
              
              "The Seat is now really vacant!"

Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Vigano on Benedict's Death?
« Reply #3 on: January 04, 2023, 01:31:26 AM »
Quote from: Incredulous on January 03, 2023, 10:34:27 PM
:popcorn:

              "The Seat is now really vacant!"

More of your nonsense?

I doubt it, unless he felt there were actual canonical grounds for it.

Regardless, unlike the Bennyvacantists, +Vigano is under no illusion that the Church crisis began in 2013 with the election of Jorge, while Ratzinger was a “St. Pius X the New” (to paraphrase one Ambrose Moran, the self-styled Josaphat the New).

+Vigano has consistently stated that the roots go back to V2 and the NOM, saying they must be completely thrown out and cannot be salvaged or reconciled with Tradition ... and has criticized most of the Conciliar papal claimants.
Logged

Offline 2Vermont

Re: Vigano on Benedict's Death?
« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2023, 06:46:22 AM »
Quote from: Ladislaus on January 04, 2023, 01:31:26 AM
More of your nonsense?

I doubt it, unless he felt there were actual canonical grounds for it.

Regardless, unlike the Bennyvacantists, +Vigano is under no illusion that the Church crisis began in 2013 with the election of Jorge, while Ratzinger was a “St. Pius X the New” (to paraphrase one Ambrose Moran, the self-styled Josaphat the New).

+Vigano has consistently stated that the roots go back to V2 and the NOM, saying they must be completely thrown out and cannot be salvaged or reconciled with Tradition ... and has criticized most of the Conciliar papal claimants.
I have often wondered whether he believed Benedict was pope when reading his writings.  More often than not, he would refer to Benedict as Benedict, but Francis as Bergoglio.  That is why I wonder what he will say.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
« previous next »