No reaction to this? Is this not just a little insane?

Yeah, Augustine Baker posted it elsewhere, I gave my thoughts there.

Anyway, it is insane, but is no surprise from the Bogus Ordo.

Really? Where? Sorry, I didn't see a thread on it already existed.

I saw this topic on another forum, and members came in with jibes asking "Does this clown have to sign a docrinal preamble?" And "Where's a Preamble when you need one?"

I was amused to see so many replies from readers who didn't get it.

They actually think that the Vatican presented a "Preamble" to the SSPX in order to prevent liturgical abuse. This is a great example of Diabolical Disorientation.

If the Vatican was interested at all in preventing liturgical abuse, why did they just approve the NeoCatechumenal Way liturgy which constitutes liturgical abuse from start to finish, and promotes every liturgical-based heresy one can imagine, short of a Black Mass. But it was approved, after many YEARS of careful consideration. So it was not a simple oversight, it was, in fact, deliberate and calculated approval. So are we to think that this is like the "beatification" of Pope Pius IX, which also brought us the disturbing "beatification" of John XXIII? We only get an Advent directive to return "And with your spirit" to the liturgy, among a few other things, when we have a liturgical approval of openly heretical abuse at the same time?

This is one of two things, either it's a denial of the principle of non-contradiction, or else it's paranoid schizophrenia. Either way, it's Diabolical Disorientation!

We have rampant heresy, liturgical innovation that's destructive of the Faith of Catholics, public, notorious sinners receiving Holy Communion, so-called Catholic politicians promoting abortion, contraception and euthanasia, a national health plan that requires Catholics to violate their own conscience by approving  contraception practices and abortions, and all the Vatican has to say is that the SSPX has to make promises. But the SSPX does none of these abusive things. And readers are under the impression that Rome is protecting the Faith by being demanding of the SSPX. Diabolical Disorientation.

The SSPX does not engage in liturgical abuse, and does not corrupt doctrine: they preserve the integrity of doctrine and the PREVENT liturgical abuse. So why a preamble?  

The Preamble, which we really don't know because it's still "secret," must therefore be all about protecting the practice of rampant liturgical abuse, like this Bunny Hop mess. The Doctrinal Preamble is therefore likely an attempt to PROMOTE liturgical abuse.

This should be widely considered to be the likely case, and if any bishop, prelate, cleric, functionary or journalist wants to challenge this interpretation, all they have to do is produce a copy of the Preamble for all to see, and explain why it is NOT protecting liturgical abuse. If they can't produce  a copy, then they should cease their useless defense of the indefensible.