Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Crisis in the Church => Topic started by: stevusmagnus on December 28, 2010, 11:38:25 PM
-
"From the brilliant British series, Yes, Prime Minister. Dead-on accurate, as usual.
Though the episode is about the Anglican establishment,
the parallels to the post-Conciliar church are striking. Runs about 4 minutes.
The new Prime Minister has to choose a bishop for a vacant diocese"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_Ox24WIBEQ&feature=player_embedded
-
A Modernist is someone who has adopted the Freemason heretical doctrine that Salvation can be achieved in no matter what religion you are in. A Modernist rejects the dogmatic teaching of "no salvation outside the Church". A Modernist rejects dogmatic teachings of the Church which declares that one can only enter the Church by Water baptism. A Modernist entertains the possibility of human evolution. A Modernist accepts and defends all of Vatican II's teachings. etc.......
-
A Modernist is someone who has adopted the Freemason heretical doctrine that Salvation can be achieved in no matter what religion you are in.
No, that's a universalist and an indifferentist.
A Modernist rejects the dogmatic teaching of "no salvation outside the Church".
No, they say everyone belongs to the Church - you need to better explain their tricks :)
A Modernist rejects dogmatic teachings of the Church which declares that one can only enter the Church by Water baptism.
Many saints have defended the views your Feeneyite sect condemns, and they were not modernists.
A Modernist entertains the possibility of human evolution.
Yes.
A Modernist accepts and defends all of Vatican II's teachings. etc.......
Not always, but usually.
A modernist, fundamentally, is an agnostic idealist who pretends to be a Christian.
-
"The modernist theologian turns to the Jew and says, 'Look, we have removed the stumbling block'; and to the Greek, ' Behold, we have removed the foolishness.' But, somehow or other, in response to all this tampering with creeds and dogmas, the Jews and the Greeks are not very interested."
from Radio replies dated 1942
Very interesting to myself, the date this was said, as if it would be known that a modern council would be called, with so-called popes tampering with creeds and dogmas as stated above.
-
"The modernist theologian turns to the Jew and says, 'Look, we have removed the stumbling block'; and to the Greek, ' Behold, we have removed the foolishness.' But, somehow or other, in response to all this tampering with creeds and dogmas, the Jews and the Greeks are not very interested."
from Radio replies dated 1942
Very interesting to myself, the date this was said, as if it would be known that a modern council would be called, with so-called popes tampering with creeds and dogmas as stated above.
Myrna, which volume and page of Radio Replies?
-
"The modernist theologian turns to the Jew and says, 'Look, we have removed the stumbling block'; and to the Greek, ' Behold, we have removed the foolishness.' But, somehow or other, in response to all this tampering with creeds and dogmas, the Jews and the Greeks are not very interested."
from Radio replies dated 1942
Very interesting to myself, the date this was said, as if it would be known that a modern council would be called, with so-called popes tampering with creeds and dogmas as stated above.
Myrna, which volume and page of Radio Replies?
Volume 3, page 132 item: 536
-
"The modernist theologian turns to the Jew and says, 'Look, we have removed the stumbling block'; and to the Greek, ' Behold, we have removed the foolishness.' But, somehow or other, in response to all this tampering with creeds and dogmas, the Jews and the Greeks are not very interested."
from Radio replies dated 1942
Very interesting to myself, the date this was said, as if it would be known that a modern council would be called, with so-called popes tampering with creeds and dogmas as stated above.
Myrna, which volume and page of Radio Replies?
Volume 3, page 132 item: 536
Many thanks Myrna! :smile:
-
Is Radio Replies Fr. Coughlin?
Is this a book of a Catholic radio show?
-
Is Radio Replies Fr. Coughlin?
Is this a book of a Catholic radio show?
From the back cover of volume 3:
Radio Replies are questions and answers about the Catholic faith compiled and published by the famous radio priests, Fathers Rumble and Carty. Father Rumble broadcast from Sydney, Australia, and Father Carty from St. Paul, Minnesota. The questions printed here were sent in by the many listeners of these intrepid priests, who answered them over the air. Later, they assembled into these three volumes their best questions and answers about the Catholic faith. That work now comprises a unique body of apologetics. The immense popularity of these books is due in no part to the direct and succinct style of their answers, plus the prodigious learning these men display. Containing some 4,374 questions and answers, these books provide hours of stimulating, informative reading on virtually every subject relating to the Church, and being fully indexed, they readily serve as a wonderful source of reference about the Faith. Further, these writings like none other, impart an immediacy and a crusading spirit, which convey to the reader a warmth and and a love and zeal for our holy religion.
-
From Ref. Dr. Leslie Rumble, MSC
and Rev. Charles Mortimer CartyGiven from the Catholic Broadcasting Station, Sydney, Australia; Way befoe you were born, I feel
Every Catholic should get these three volumn books, you can google them and buy them online. My parents always had them in their home, they cover everything in question and answer form. Excellent and easy to read.
-
Excellent! I may check them out.
-
A Modernist rejects the already established infallible teaching of the Church that ONLY through the sacrament of water baptism can a person enter God's Church.
A Modernist accepts the false heretical belief of Baptism of Desire and Baptism of Blood.
-
A Modernist rejects the already established infallible teaching of the Church that ONLY through the sacrament of water baptism can a person enter God's Church
A Modernist accepts the false heretical belief of Baptism of Desire and Baptism of Blood.
Was St. Thomas Aquinas a modernist?
Making your post bold doesn't make what you say relevant to how one defines modernism.
-
Was St. Thomas Aquinas a modernist?
Aquinas was simply wrong on BoD, just as he was wrong when he claimed that the blessed virgin Mary was not born of immaculate conception.
Ofcourse, if the Church had dogmatically declared Water Baptism and the teaching on the Immaculate Conception before Aquinas made those comments, then obviously Aquinas would have rejected BoD and accepted the Church's teaching on the Immaculate Conception.
Today we have the infallible dogmatic teaching of the Church which says that ONLY through water baptism can a person receive the gift of salvation. Therefore all Catholics must accept this teaching or else be anathema as Trent had stated.
-
Making your post bold doesn't make what you say relevant to how one defines modernism.
True Tele, but it does make it possible for a middle aged woman to read first thing in the morning. :rolleyes:
-
Ofcourse, if the Church had dogmatically declared Water Baptism and the teaching on the Immaculate Conception before Aquinas made those comments, then obviously Aquinas would have rejected BoD and accepted the Church's teaching on the Immaculate Conception.
My mistake. Actually Water Baptism was infallibly declared before Aquinas made such comments, but that does not mean that he knew of those teachings.
St. Robert Bellarmine: “It is very credible that St. Thomas, Alexander of Hales, and other scholastic doctors had not seen the second synod of Nice [Nicea II], nor the eighth general synod… [they] were long in obscurity, and were first published in our own age, as may be known from their not being extant in the older volumes of the councils; and St. Thomas and the other ancient schoolmen never make any mention of this Nicene Synod.” (De Imag. Sanct. Lib. II. Cap. Xxij.; quoted in NPNF2, Vol. 14, p. 526)
St. Robert Bellarmine says that St. Thomas Aquinas was probably unaware of what was taught in the seventh and eighth ecuмenical councils of the Catholic Church: that is, the Second Council of Nicea in 787, and the Fourth Council of Constantinople in 869-870. This is a significant statement. Some people have argued that it’s impossible or unthinkable that a doctor of the Church could be wrong or ignorant of something taught at a council. To the contrary, the teaching of doctors of the Church is important, but it is not infallible. A doctor of the Church can be wrong and even ignorant of certain things that have been taught by the Church. Their teaching certainly does not weigh more than the teaching of the Magisterium.
Pope Benedict XIV, Apostolica (# 6), June 26, 1749: “The Church’s judgment is preferable to that of a Doctor renowned for his holiness and teaching.”
Pope Pius XII, Humani generis (# 21), Aug. 12, 1950: “This deposit of faith our Divine Redeemer has given for authentic interpretation not to each of the faithful, not even to theologians, but only to the Teaching Authority of the Church.’”
So we can see that the defenders of “baptism of desire”– and even those who say that it’s unthinkable that baptism of desire could be incompatible with Catholic teaching if a doctor of the Church believed in it – are wrong again