Ladislaus said:And subjection to the Roman Pontiff does not happen and cannot happen without the character either.
You have no proof for that, although I know what you will quote: "What have we to do with those who are without." I could easily just shoot back that catechumens are without in an external sense, that the Pope did not have in mind how they could be within through desire if they happened to die before baptism.
Technically, as catechumens, they are without, that is why they don't go to Communion. This is nothing new. You can't take isolated comments about baptism being necessary, or catechumens being without, and use them against baptism of desire. These are simply general statements; while teachings on baptism of desire explain an exceptional circuмstance.
Underneath you can see the same logic that the Church always had, at least until the 1917 Code of Canon Law which permits catechumens to be buried in hallowed ground -- from what we see, from external indications, the unbaptized are not part of the Church, but God can save them if He wants to.
How do you get around that Code without disobedience, though, Ladislaus? Do you see that CM is actually being more consistent than you by claiming Benedict XV is an anti-Pope?