"their priest tells them to"

Example, please.

Situations like:

A husband wants to switch from  R and R to sedevacantist.  

Or the woman talks to a NO priest and goes back to the NO.

Or the priest doesn't want to cross a woman who is emotional about her husband believes the woman (without getting the other side of the story) and tells her to leave the husband.

Basically wherever the woman disagrees with her husband, and maybe 3cen her father she will go to the priest (because he in her eyes has higher authority) to get what she wants.  

oh yes the intention question.

The problem is that he withheld ALL intention. That's the point.

He knew full well that would make the Sacrament invalid.

A Bishop like that is either extremely malicious, or totally insane.

The problem is that he withheld ALL intention. That's the point.

Considering he administered the sacraments with proper form and matter, no, he did not. If he did not intend to do what the Church does, he would not have done what the Church does

And what exactly does withholding "ALL intention" mean? Can you withhold half intention? Would the sacrament be half valid if so? What if you withheld 99% intention? Would that still be valid?

He knew full well that would make the Sacrament invalid.

It didn't, and it wouldn't have even if that's what he was thinking. If he did not want the sacraments to be effected, than he should not have properly administered them.

Proper matter + proper form = intention to do what the Church does is presumed, even if it be a "virtual intention" = valid Sacrament

Considering he administered the sacraments with proper form and matter, no, he did not. If he did not intend to do what the Church does, he would not have done what the Church does

And what exactly does withholding "ALL intention" mean? Can you withhold half intention? Would the sacrament be half valid if so? What if you withheld 99% intention? Would that still be valid?
It didn't, and it wouldn't have even if that's what he was thinking. If he did not want the sacraments to be effected, than he should not have properly administered them.

Proper matter + proper form = intention to do what the Church does is presumed, even if it be a "virtual intention" = valid Sacrament

Intention is an essential part of the validity of the Sacraments.

Where did you learn your sacramental theology ? Back of a cereal packet? Youtube?

It literally does. What are you talking about? An even with baptism they still do have to have subjective intention to do what the Church does.
In the case of the other sacraments it is different.But the subjective intention is most certainly required. You clearly have no idea what you are rambling on about.

Who let you on the internet?

TomGubbinsKimmage. Go read before you post more on this topic. Start with the section below:


https://aquinas.cc/la/en/~ST.III.Q64.A9.C

I answer that, As stated above (A. 5), since the minister works instrumentally in the sacraments, he acts not by his own but by Christ’s power. Now just as charity belongs to a man’s own power so also does faith. Wherefore, just as the validity of a sacrament does not require that the minister should have charity, and even sinners can confer sacraments, as stated above (A. 5); so neither is it necessary that he should have faith, and even an unbeliever can confer a true sacrament, provided that the other essentials be there.

A Compilation: Abp. Lefebvre [and the traditional-SSPX] on the Thuc-line Bishops
A Warning to Traditional Catholics Concerning False Shepherds
The Angelus June 1982

So, another sock-puppet account that signed on to go on the attack.

It's well docuмented that early in the 1980s, +Lefebvre had become very hopefuly about a practical arrangement with Rome under Wojtyla, and begged him to be allowed to make the "experiment of Tradition" within the Conciliar pantheon, and thus threw SV priests under the bus and sacrificed them at the altar of the Modernists.

As for Holy Orders, it's well known that +Lefebvre accepted as valid a priest (Fr. Bruno I believe) who had been ordained by +Thuc.

TomGubbinsKimmage. Go read before you post more on this topic. Start with the section below:


https://aquinas.cc/la/en/~ST.III.Q64.A9.C

I answer that, As stated above (A. 5), since the minister works instrumentally in the sacraments, he acts not by his own but by Christ’s power. Now just as charity belongs to a man’s own power so also does faith. Wherefore, just as the validity of a sacrament does not require that the minister should have charity, and even sinners can confer sacraments, as stated above (A. 5); so neither is it necessary that he should have faith, and even an unbeliever can confer a true sacrament, provided that the other essentials be there.

Yes, and he goes on to explain elsewhere that when someone has the intention to DO what the Church does, the Church then provides the intention that this action have the intended Sacramental effect.

So, the "internal" intention (which RubbishKimmage here conflates wiht "subjective") need only consiste of intending to do this Rite of the Church, as in, to actually do it.  Excluded would be someone doing the Rite in order to mock it or simply to put on a play or a movie, etc.  They're not intending to do the Rite of the Church, but to make a movie, put on a play, or mock the Church, and this type of intention can in fact be known from the external forum.  But if I put on my vestments, go on to a Catholic church where the bulletin says there's going to be a 9AM Mass, put on my vestments, and then go out and perform the Rite prescribed by the Church ... that's all the intention that's required.

I can supply the garage. Just back out the 4-Runner, hang nice curtains on side walls, put a nice rug on the floor, clear the workbench. The bench can easily become an altar. It’s heavy duty, elevated, attached to wall, even facing ad orientum! About a dozen people can be seated with room for 4-6 within and around the altar area. There’s a door to the outside and a door into the house, into a small alcove usable as a sacristy. Parking is available on the street in cul-de-sac, also, there’s an overflow parking lot for overnight guests, walking distance on a paved trail to the house. Handicapped accessible.
I can accommodate 7-8 overnight guests, more if some are willing to sleep on fold out sofa and camp cot.  Many 4-5 ⭐️ hotels plus AirBnb within 15 miles, easy on/off interstate, main highways. Lots of restaurants and shopping nearby.
Area amenable to tourists, vacationers, lots of scenic areas for all tastes.

You supply the Thuc bishop, the candidates for ordinations and consecrations. Volunteers will be needed for set up, clean up, cooking, extra seating, etc. Must bring own items for altar, but I can supply lovely flowers.
Homeowner, (that’s me) has final say over who is ordained and/or consecrated. In general, must be human, male, attained age 25 for a priest, 35 for a bishop. He must be of sound body, mind, and morals, single without dependents, have no debt and is not a co-signer of an outstanding loan, be a Traditional Catholic for a minimum of five years,  prove he has studied and passed a rigorous program of preparation, in the USA legally whether a resident or visitor. Homeowner reserves  right to accept or refuse everyone from being on the property. HOA reserves right to enforce deportment of visitors to community up to and including laws of municipality and state, enforced by county and state police. Communication Media
by invitation of homeowner in cooperation with participants.
Let’s all pray for an increase in the number of traditional Catholic vocations!

I love this. We need to send you a priest and start having regular services at your house.