Photograph studies confirmed two Sister Lucys:
http://www.traditioninaction.org/Questions/B652_Lucys.html
.
Excerpt from linked page:
.
.
Quote:
.
At left, we see a simple peasant, but with a rich personality. She is serious, profound, rock firm in her decisions, and acutely aware that she has a great mission to accomplish. There is no trace of vanity or worldly thoughts in her way of dress or demeanor.
.
At right, we see a sentimental girl, entirely turned toward pleasing others. Her weak personality makes her susceptible to do whatever she is instructed by her friends. She is vain, coquettish and mediocre. She enjoys intruding into other people's lives in order to discover trifling details and become involved in intrigues.
.
.
.
The age regression service did not ask for samples of clothing, nor is there any hint that projecting styles of dress is a part of their service.
.
How does a viewer of a single photo arrive at conclusions regarding sentimentality or pleasing others or susceptibility to follow directions, of vanity, coquettishness and mediocrity? How does one arrive at knowledge the subject's enjoyment of intrusion into the lives of others to discover trifling details and becoming involved in intrigues? One gets the impression the author was Arthur Conan Doyle.
.