CathInfo.com

This thread is showing itself to be quite an important topic for our Catholic education.  It seems our understanding of Catholic history is closely related to our comprehension of who is and who is not a Catholic Bishop of Rome.

We need to correctly identify both the good guys and the bad guys in our history if we are to correctly identify the Catholic and non-Catholic occupants of the Chair of Peter.  The historic Bonapartist heritage shouldn't be seen by us as a primary locus of evil in history because then we fail to see the actual bad guys.  For example, when we imagine that Napoleon was an Anti-christ we thereby fail to notice that the actual Anti-christ of the 19th Century was clearly none other than Abraham Lincoln and not anyone else.  In a similar way it should be glaringly clear to us that  much the greatest enemy of the Catholics in the 20th Century was certainly the Fabian Marxist  Franklin Roosevelt and not anybody else.

Evidently we Americans have a great problem with recognizing our own American role in Catholic history, both past and present.  Our true American history is anything but any reason for us to think like Americanists and shift the guilt for our own actions onto Europeans like Napoleon.  The evil precursors to Lincoln and his Radical Republicans were Maximilian Robespierre and the Jacobin Party that was aggressively destroyed by the Bonapartists.  Later the American Bonapartist President Grant did much the same to our  own Radical Republican Jacobins.  Good riddance to them!  

What we need most today is someone like Napoleon to clear out the Zionist Marxists.  Only then can we seriously think about restoring a Roman Catholic onto the Chair of Peter in Rome.

Please chunk whatever history book you've been reading and find one that was written by a Catholic author with some common sense.

Correction above.