Author Topic: Una cuм mortal sin? (Read 5219 times)

Shrewd Operator · « **Reply #40 on:** December 07, 2022, 07:49:08 PM »

Is it always permissible for the priest to say "Una cuм Petrus" as is done during an interregnum. Can it be used as a wild card by a priest who can't remember the regal name, or doubts the identity, or status of the papal claimants?

Nadir · « **Reply #41 on:** December 07, 2022, 09:55:44 PM »

Quote from: Gunter on December 07, 2022, 11:39:31 AM

Should it be presumed that all priests of the sspx mention the name of the current pope in the Canon?
Is this the sxpx official public position? And where can one see the official position?

SSPX is officially sedeplenist. So, of course they pray for the pope in the Mass.

DigitalLogos · « **Reply #42 on:** December 07, 2022, 10:17:35 PM »

Quote from: Ladislaus on December 03, 2022, 12:44:16 PM

People have accused me of being a dogamtic SV. I'm nothing of the sort. I'm a dogmatic indefectibilist. To attribute Vatican II and the NOM to the Holy Catholic Church is to undermine the Church's indefectibility ... unless you're engaged in the types of gymnastics where you try to assert that they're reconcilable with Tradition and most of the NOM aberrations are simply "abuses".

Ultimately, I stand with you in that position. It's honestly what drew me from FE when I started taking the sede position seriously, as the indefectibility of the Church is the key issue on identifying the V2 sect as false; the question of the vacant See is secondary. And while I don't hold to either sedeimpoundism or sedeprivationism anymore, I believe the See is vacant, I also cannot sit here and say that people are heretics for adhering to liturgies that name Bergoglio as Pope are heretics or in mortal sin.

2Vermont · « **Reply #43 on:** December 08, 2022, 06:53:18 AM »

Quote from: DigitalLogos on December 07, 2022, 10:17:35 PM

Ultimately, I stand with you in that position. It's honestly what drew me from FE when I started taking the sede position seriously, as the indefectibility of the Church is the key issue on identifying the V2 sect as false; the question of the vacant See is secondary. And while I don't hold to either sedeimpoundism or sedeprivationism anymore, I believe the See is vacant, I also cannot sit here and say that people are heretics for adhering to liturgies that name Bergoglio as Pope are heretics or in mortal sin.

I am sitting where you are DL (although I've never held sedeimpoundism nor sedeprivationism... I have always held sedevacantism).

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Una cuм mortal sin? (Read 5219 times)

Shrewd Operator

Re: Una cuм mortal sin?

Nadir

Re: Una cuм mortal sin?

DigitalLogos

Re: Una cuм mortal sin?

2Vermont

Re: Una cuм mortal sin?