Author Topic: True catholics dont use words and phrases like you do... (Read 7194 times)

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #30 on:** September 09, 2011, 08:44:25 AM »

Quote from: stevusmagnus

Is it me or does GV tend to get in knock down drag-outs with just about everyone?

gunslinger and I are not even having any kind of "knock down, drag out" exchange. As for this...

Quote

Every new poster can wander into the subforum, have GV call them out, insult them, brag about his physical prowess, and challenge them to a fight.

I don't recall gunslinger and I talking about having an actual fight. We are just on different sides of some issues. I only told him my height and weight because he posted a photo of a mega-chunkster and asked if/implied that I look like that, too. I simply answered his question.

Quote

I saw your video post on here and I must say I was impressed and a bit shocked that, in person (and sober) you seem like a mild mannered very nice and reasonable gentleman.

LOL! Thanks :)

Quote

Godspeed, my friend! :cheers:

Same to you, stevie :)

gunfighter · « **Reply #31 on:** September 09, 2011, 10:34:13 AM »

Quote from: gladius_veritatis

Quote from: gunfighter
Eamon, I doubt if you would be so insulting in person.

As I have already said, I think we'd probably get along quite well in person. FWIW, pointing out that you are wrong on this point -- which is as clear as day, as is your avoidance of this fact -- is not meant as an insult.

Quote
Most internet tough guys like you are cowards.

You may be right, but that is not really ad rem, is it? [BTW, isn't your comment kind of 'Internet-Tough-Guy-ish'? Should we presume, therefore, that you are really a very chunky monkey with no actual courage? I, for one, would not do so...]

Quote
It is much easier to write than fight. Most look like this guy, is this you?

Nope...6'3", 200, strong as a bull, although not presently in THE best shape of my life. Still, you may rest assured I am no donut-loving Michelin Man :)

Most of you McThis and McThat comments could be viewed as insults.

Chunky may not be a bad description of me. Of course, size is not an indication of fighting ability. However, I don't believe I have threatened to beat anyone up, or told a grandma that I handle men 100x as tough as her.

I prefer not to fight.

SJB · « **Reply #32 on:** September 09, 2011, 05:44:50 PM »

Quote from: gunfighter

Quote from: gladius_veritatis
Quote from: gunfighter
Eamon, I doubt if you would be so insulting in person.

As I have already said, I think we'd probably get along quite well in person. FWIW, pointing out that you are wrong on this point -- which is as clear as day, as is your avoidance of this fact -- is not meant as an insult.

Quote
Most internet tough guys like you are cowards.

You may be right, but that is not really ad rem, is it? [BTW, isn't your comment kind of 'Internet-Tough-Guy-ish'? Should we presume, therefore, that you are really a very chunky monkey with no actual courage? I, for one, would not do so...]

Quote
It is much easier to write than fight. Most look like this guy, is this you?

Nope...6'3", 200, strong as a bull, although not presently in THE best shape of my life. Still, you may rest assured I am no donut-loving Michelin Man :)

Most of you McThis and McThat comments could be viewed as insults.

Chunky may not be a bad description of me. Of course, size is not an indication of fighting ability. However, I don't believe I have threatened to beat anyone up, or told a grandma that I handle men 100x as tough as her.

I prefer not to fight.

Your first post here in 2009, as "skifast," suggested that us "internet tough guys" should have "beaten the crap out of" Mr. Lotarski.

gunfighter · « **Reply #33 on:** September 09, 2011, 07:14:50 PM »

If I were skifast, I would have been referring to defending my children. Yes, I will go to blows for them. I train to be able to defend my family. I hope I never will have to use the skills, hand to hand with weapons.

I doubt that you would find skifast or gunslinger threatening people I disagree with.

Can you ever be intellectually honest and not twist things into what they are not?

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #34 on:** September 09, 2011, 07:29:12 PM »

Quote from: gunfighter

I don't believe I have threatened to beat anyone up, or told a grandma that I handle men 100x as tough as her.

Whom did I threaten to beat up? I am not denying that I ever did so, but I'd like the specifics with respect to your latest cheap shot from the past that has nothing to do with you. Thanks.

Telling a granny -- who had first told me she was not intimidated by me -- that I was, in so many words, far from intimidated by her means what?

[FWIW, you Do realize you are repeatedly referencing comments I made while inebriated, for which I have apologized, right?]

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #35 on:** September 09, 2011, 07:30:57 PM »

BTW, when are you going to admit that you are WRONG on the matter of the sinful nature of vulgarity?

gunfighter · « **Reply #36 on:** September 09, 2011, 08:52:44 PM »

Quote from: gladius_veritatis

Quote from: gunfighter
I don't believe I have threatened to beat anyone up, or told a grandma that I handle men 100x as tough as her.

Whom did I threaten to beat up? I am not denying that I ever did so, but I'd like the specifics with respect to your latest cheap shot from the past that has nothing to do with you. Thanks.

Telling a granny -- who had first told me she was not intimidated by me -- that I was, in so many words, far from intimidated by her means what?

[FWIW, you Do realize you are repeatedly referencing comments I made while inebriated, for which I have apologized, right?]

Actually, I missed the apology. As I recall, you said something about mutilating the Mel Gibson guy, if he said something to your face.

Seems to me it is fair game given you penchant for throwing out insults and name calling.

gunfighter · « **Reply #37 on:** September 09, 2011, 08:56:13 PM »

Quote from: gladius_veritatis

BTW, when are you going to admit that you are WRONG on the matter of the sinful nature of vulgarity?

Believe it or not, I have many things that take priority over researching a issue that does not apply to me.

I stopped swearing when I came back to the Church. I teach my kids not to do so. Whether or not it is a sin is not relevant to me, since it is without any doubt a reflection of poor manners and uncivil behavior.

ColdFusion · « **Reply #38 on:** September 09, 2011, 09:56:28 PM »

Quote from: gunfighter

Believe it or not, I have many things that take priority over researching a issue that does not apply to me.

That's obvious. Sure doesn't stop you from talking about it.

gunfighter · « **Reply #39 on:** September 09, 2011, 10:15:16 PM »

Quote from: ColdFusion

Quote from: gunfighter

Believe it or not, I have many things that take priority over researching a issue that does not apply to me.

That's obvious. Sure doesn't stop you from talking about it.

I think you missed the class on the virtue of charity. Maybe you should stop posting and learn how to grow in the spiritual life.

ColdFusion · « **Reply #40 on:** September 09, 2011, 10:24:24 PM »

Quote from: gunfighter

Quote from: ColdFusion
Quote from: gunfighter

Believe it or not, I have many things that take priority over researching a issue that does not apply to me.

That's obvious. Sure doesn't stop you from talking about it.

I think you missed the class on the virtue of charity. Maybe you should stop posting and learn how to grow in the spiritual life.

Funny, I was thinking the same about you. Reading comprehension does not seem to be your forte, either.

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #41 on:** September 09, 2011, 10:26:48 PM »

Quote from: gunfighter

Actually, I missed the apology.

Go look it up :)

Quote

As I recall, you said something about mutilating the Mel Gibson guy, if he said something to your face.

I did, I would. I am not a chunky skunk like you :)

Quote

Seems to me it is fair game given you penchant for throwing out insults and name calling.

I'll throw out another just for you, dumb ass... When are you going to admit, like a simple and sane man, that your take on vulgarity is WRONG???

Either you are immeasurably dumber than an enormous box of the most jagged rocks, or you just cannot admit you were WRONG about the sinful nature of vulgarity. Which is it?

gunfighter · « **Reply #42 on:** September 10, 2011, 10:41:18 AM »

Drinking again?

gunfighter · « **Reply #43 on:** September 10, 2011, 11:52:43 AM »

Quote from: gladius_veritatis

I'll throw out another just for you, dumb ass... When are you going to admit, like a simple and sane man, that your take on vulgarity is WRONG???

Either you are immeasurably dumber than an enormous box of the most jagged rocks, or you just cannot admit you were WRONG about the sinful nature of vulgarity. Which is it?

Ephesians Chapter 5

1 Be ye therefore followers of God, as most dear children; 2 And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath delivered himself for us, an oblation and a sacrifice to God for an odour of sweetness. 3 But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not so much as be named among you, as becometh saints: 4 Or obscenity, or foolish talking, or scurrility, which is to no purpose; but rather giving of thanks. 5 For know you this and understand, that no fornicator, or unclean, or covetous person (which is a serving of idols), hath inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.

SJB · « **Reply #44 on:** September 10, 2011, 06:22:53 PM »

Quote from: gunfighter

Quote from: gladius_veritatis
I'll throw out another just for you, dumb ass... When are you going to admit, like a simple and sane man, that your take on vulgarity is WRONG???

Either you are immeasurably dumber than an enormous box of the most jagged rocks, or you just cannot admit you were WRONG about the sinful nature of vulgarity. Which is it?

Ephesians Chapter 5

1 Be ye therefore followers of God, as most dear children; 2 And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath delivered himself for us, an oblation and a sacrifice to God for an odour of sweetness. 3 But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not so much as be named among you, as becometh saints: 4 Or obscenity, or foolish talking, or scurrility, which is to no purpose; but rather giving of thanks. 5 For know you this and understand, that no fornicator, or unclean, or covetous person (which is a serving of idols), hath inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.

Thought you didn't take the time to transcribe texts? Now quote some moral theology.