You conveniently overlooked this passage:  Christ is salvation for all. That there do not exist two ways of salvation

That's not the problem.  Rather it is the implicit assertion that they are already united to this way of salvation, even in the face of their explicit denial.  The Modernist has no problem stating that Christ is the only way of salvation, his error comes in when he asserts that all men partake of this salvation by their false religion or some variation of this error.

I do not have the time nor the patience to explain the covenants of the Old Testaments... yes, they have been fulfilled in Christ and the Church and they were NOT saving covenants - they need Christ for salvation.

Check.

 

But they have a relationship with God - initiated by God and irrevocable!

Sorry, wrong answer.  This blatantly contradicts Scripture and the very words of our Lord cited above.  Their relationship was in the form of the legal Covenant, which you just admitted was revoked.  This is nothing but double-speak.

Again - God has gone beyond those covenants, which were NOT salvific.  And we want the Jews to accept the fullness of the revelation of God in Christ and His Church.

Right and without this, they will be condemned.  

Maybe he missionary in the sense that they do not know God - which would not be true.  They do not know God fully - that that is what we pray for - that the Lord might hasten the historic hour in which we will all be united IN CHRIST!!

They do not know God at all if they do not know Christ.  Of course, men can assent to various opinions about God, they can entertain various material facts, but it lacks any supernatural character.  It is by the virtue of Faith that we know and believe formed by charity.  But if we are already "united" in a mysterious bond, why hasten the hour?  What is the rush if their salvation doesn't really depend upon it?  Underlying these notions appears to be a form of neo-modernism.  They will state that the old covenant is revoked or was simply provisional.  This is what trips up the "conservative."  But in stating that they still maintain some "relationship" they must mean that the Jews have simply come to experience God in a different way.  Thus, the Jews of the Old Testament experienced God under the Law, but the Jews of today have simply evolved in their understanding and experience dispensing with the "need" of the Law.  

That's enough... I am tired of defending the Vicar of Christ against charges of heresy... you seem to read his writings with a hermeneutic of suspicion... and you always know better than him (after all what kind of theological credentials does he have anyway?!?)...  please keep me out of any theological posts you send in the future.

You know what?  Hiding behind an office while deceiving the flock is exactly why our Lord so vehemently upbraided the Pharisees.  It is a most noxious attitude.  And what are your theological "credentials"?  I wonder where you studied such convoluted, ill-defined nonsense.  And don't poison the well with neologisms such as "hermeneutic of suspicion."  Just answer the question.  Indeed, you would do well to stay out of any further "theological" defences in the future as you seem to muddy the waters while implicitly indicting the Vicar of Christ.