Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Trads against Pants on Women "An American Pestilence"  (Read 2223 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline stevusmagnus

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3728
  • Reputation: +825/-1
  • Gender: Male
    • h
Trads against Pants on Women "An American Pestilence"
« on: November 17, 2009, 03:02:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Posted on another forum...

    Quote
    As far as the "pants" argument...that horse has been so beaten to death, that even its creator has moved on to other things...like the h0Ɩ0cαųst. Probably since these wannabe Amish Catholics are mostly an American pestilence. Argentinians at La Reja cringed at the thought of ground dragging hemlines and "pants police". They made it clear that such nonsense might play on the plains of Kansas; it was DOA on the Pampas.
    H.E. got the message and stuck to his strong suits, Wagner and Confirmations.
    Logged

    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Trads against Pants on Women "An American Pestilence"
    « Reply #1 on: November 17, 2009, 03:05:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • I don't know what to day. I am truly shocked. I thought the women in South America were more feminine than those in the states. I guess i was wrong. I feel sorry that Bishop Williamson had to deal with such a disgusting creature as made the above post.
    Logged

    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Trads against Pants on Women "An American Pestilence"
    « Reply #2 on: November 17, 2009, 03:06:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Let me guess. Was it a fisheaters post?
    Logged

    Offline stevusmagnus

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3728
    • Reputation: +825/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Trads against Pants on Women "An American Pestilence"
    « Reply #3 on: November 17, 2009, 03:11:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • No, this idiocy is actually well worded.

    A typical FE response would have included some middle school name calling and a variety of emoticons.
    Logged

    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Trads against Pants on Women "An American Pestilence"
    « Reply #4 on: November 17, 2009, 03:13:11 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Angelqueen?
    Logged

    Offline Caraffa

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 989
    • Reputation: +558/-47
    • Gender: Male
    Trads against Pants on Women "An American Pestilence"
    « Reply #5 on: November 17, 2009, 03:32:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: stevusmagnus
    Posted on another forum...

    Quote
    As far as the "pants" argument...that horse has been so beaten to death, that even its creator has moved on to other things...like the h0Ɩ0cαųst. Probably since these wannabe Amish Catholics are mostly an American pestilence. Argentinians at La Reja cringed at the thought of ground dragging hemlines and "pants police". They made it clear that such nonsense might play on the plains of Kansas; it was DOA on the Pampas.
    H.E. got the message and stuck to his strong suits, Wagner and Confirmations.


    Notice the poster's flight of fancy by trying to link those who are anti-pants with Americanism. Sorry, its not going to work because Americanism was linked with egalitarianism (which the pro-pants crew supports), and later feminism.
    Logged
    Pray for me, always.

    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Trads against Pants on Women "An American Pestilence"
    « Reply #6 on: November 17, 2009, 03:35:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • True, the linkage with Americanism was poorly thought out, but maybe it was meant to appeal to those of lesser intellect.
    Logged

    Offline Caraffa

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 989
    • Reputation: +558/-47
    • Gender: Male
    Trads against Pants on Women "An American Pestilence"
    « Reply #7 on: November 17, 2009, 03:39:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: stevusmagnus
    No, this idiocy is actually well worded.

    A typical FE response would have included some middle school name calling and a variety of emoticons.


    And would later be followed by punkish rock music from NIN and rap music from Nelly.  :headbanger:  :ape:
    Logged
    Pray for me, always.

    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    Trads against Pants on Women "An American Pestilence"
    « Reply #8 on: November 17, 2009, 04:01:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: stevusmagnus
    Posted on another forum...

    Quote
    As far as the "pants" argument...that horse has been so beaten to death, that even its creator has moved on to other things...like the h0Ɩ0cαųst. Probably since these wannabe Amish Catholics are mostly an American pestilence. Argentinians at La Reja cringed at the thought of ground dragging hemlines and "pants police". They made it clear that such nonsense might play on the plains of Kansas; it was DOA on the Pampas.
    H.E. got the message and stuck to his strong suits, Wagner and Confirmations.


    sounds like our "hardcore trads" at FE........
    Logged
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic

    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    Trads against Pants on Women "An American Pestilence"
    « Reply #9 on: November 17, 2009, 04:02:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: stevusmagnus
    No, this idiocy is actually well worded.

    A typical FE response would have included some middle school name calling and a variety of emoticons.


    ah......missed this post, sorry....I vote for AQ..
    Logged
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic

    Offline Jehanne

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2561
    • Reputation: +459/-11
    • Gender: Male
    Trads against Pants on Women "An American Pestilence"
    « Reply #10 on: November 17, 2009, 06:18:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: stevusmagnus
    Posted on another forum...

    Quote
    As far as the "pants" argument...that horse has been so beaten to death, that even its creator has moved on to other things...like the h0Ɩ0cαųst. Probably since these wannabe Amish Catholics are mostly an American pestilence. Argentinians at La Reja cringed at the thought of ground dragging hemlines and "pants police". They made it clear that such nonsense might play on the plains of Kansas; it was DOA on the Pampas.
    H.E. got the message and stuck to his strong suits, Wagner and Confirmations.


    And, those poster's docuмentation for this is where?  Sorry, but Central and South American women still largely dress in skirts/dresses.
    Logged

    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1158/-863
    • Gender: Male
    Trads against Pants on Women "An American Pestilence"
    « Reply #11 on: November 17, 2009, 06:23:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • I would be shocked to see our Lady in pants.  She always appeared in the garb of the culture but never appeared in pants.  

    Pants are for men.  If you look at the history of the world, you will see that women never wore pants until very recently.

    Pants draws the attention of males to certain areas.  The Church has taught that it is wrong for women to cross-dress.

    This is all part of the devilish/masonic plan to make women into men and men into women.  And to get traditional Catholics to agree with their nonsense is just icing on the cake.  

    Rediculousness unheard of before the Great Apostacy.

    Let us try to build the culture back up instead of making excuses for its depravity.
    Logged
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church

    Offline stevusmagnus

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3728
    • Reputation: +825/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Trads against Pants on Women "An American Pestilence"
    « Reply #12 on: November 17, 2009, 08:26:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • More from same poster...

    I asked the following..

    "Do you think a Chapel dress code including a prohibition of pants on women is per se ridiculous?

    Or does your toleration extend to letting the Chapel or Society or Trad community set their own standards for modest dress?"

    Quote
    As far as the chapel prohibition question...
    Yes, and yes.
    Yes, it is per se ridiculous to have a "dress" code in church. And, yes, the chapels are free to do that if they wish.
    These are crazy times. Many people truly have no idea what is appropriate in church, or anywhere for that matter. I believe in EXAMPLE. I don't like women in slacks (in church) any more than men in shorts. At my church we've even had some NO visitors show up in tight pants and cleavage. It makes me cringe. But I tell myself, it probably isn't their fault! God bless them! It is actually SAD! So, what a PERFECT time for catechesis, no? Set an example. They're not blind. If they come often enough, they will see how the women dress. They'll figure it out. Now, if over time they don't, then...
    Our FSSP pastor gave some stern warnings from the pulpit to the women on at least two occasions over the years. He spoke of his chastity, and that of his altar boys. If a woman approached the Communion rail dressed that immodestly, he would pass them over!

    Posting signs at the front door, or having busybody ushers be the dress police is many things. Smart is not one of them.
    And please spare me the Padre Pio examples of him throwing women out of his church who were dressed immodestly. That, if its even true, was wrong. Saints are sinners too. Imagine the impression of the Church that some of those women took back home? How about showing them sadness of how they might be offending our Lord? Just a thought...

    There's ALWAYS time to bring out the big stick. And I'm a big stick kind of guy. I just prefer to use it as a last resort when it comes to things like this.


    I then said...

    "So the Pope is ridiculous to have a dress code in St. Peter's?"
    Logged

    Offline stevusmagnus

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3728
    • Reputation: +825/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Trads against Pants on Women "An American Pestilence"
    « Reply #13 on: November 17, 2009, 08:28:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Caraffa
    Quote from: stevusmagnus
    No, this idiocy is actually well worded.

    A typical FE response would have included some middle school name calling and a variety of emoticons.


    And would later be followed by punkish rock music from NIN and rap music from Nelly.  :headbanger:  :ape:


    LOL! Good one Carrafa. Very true. They would then hijack the thread in two directions. One direction would be devoted to character assassination of the poster supporting Tradition, the other direction would be a completely irrelevant scandalous discussion of modern punk music complete with Youtube links.
    Logged

    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +22/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Trads against Pants on Women "An American Pestilence"
    « Reply #14 on: November 17, 2009, 09:26:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Pants are unfeminine and completely untraditional.  That is indisputable.

    Pants are also, in practice, less modest than dresses.  Facts are facts: the typical woman, tradition Catholic or not, will not wear loose fitting pants.

    The difference between the women in pants on a college campus and the women in dresses at Church is unmistakable, irrefutable proof of the impropriety of female pantaloonery.

    http://books.google.com/books?id=jHxHAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA179&dq=female+pantaloonery#v=onepage&q=female%20pantaloonery&f=false
    Logged
    Pages: [1] 2
    « previous next »