I read this post, and I want to make a point that I think deserves its own thread.
If we cant say anythin about the clergy thats good and positive, lets all keep silence...........and let this thread die!
How does this apply to commentary on BXVI, or those clergy from V2 forward, many of whom we have hammered freely and justifiably?
It would seem that you simply advocate adopting the principle that others once used to browbeat the sheep into submission in the face of serious problems.
Honestly, WAY too many of those who used their brains to wade through the endless nonsense of V2, etc., in order to get to Traddieland just turn off their brains once they arrive. No wonder such immense havoc is wrought so easily amongst us.
People, it is an ABSOLUTE GIVEN that wolves in shepherds' clothing have found their way into the Trad fold. While this does not mean we must tar and feather all of them, for Pete's sake, be on your guard to a somewhat-reasonable degree.
When Gladius said that, I couldn't help but thinking that I've said the EXACT OPPOSITE more or less, in a different context.
I think I was referring to how some Traditional Catholics can't seem to lay down their guard AT ALL or trust anymore.
I basically said that once we've escaped from the hell of Vatican II where MOST priests are poorly formed, most parishioners don't act or believe in a Catholic manner, etc. that once we get to Tradition we SHOULD RELAX a bit.
We shouldn't act as if traditional priests are what destroyed the Church, because they haven't. They aren't responsible for our betrayal by the V2 hierarchy. In fact, they have all given up a lot to help us save our souls. They never betrayed our trust. But we're tempted to put ALL priests in the same lump category, which I believe is wrong.
I might advise to "be careful" but not be paranoid -- we do need to make sure we're not just seeing things that aren't there -- saying something negative (even if it's true) about a priest or bishop is a HUGE step and we mustn't lose sight of that, even if the majority of priests in the Novus Ordo are not praiseworthy due to ignorance or weakness.
Generally speaking, the rule of thumb is to be hard on ourselves, and make excuses for others. Unless one is in the position of authority, or the general good demands it.That's another thing about traditionalists -- some of them imply that every member of the Novus Ordo Catholic Church is part of some conspiracy to destroy the Church. Yes, a few bishops and cardinals are Masons, and the men who started all this mess certainly knew what they were doing. But every priest, every layman? I doubt it. I think many of them are proud to be a member of what they were taught is the One True Church. After all, what is the One True Church called? The Catholic Church.
My mother-in-law goes to her local parish -- it says right on the sign, "Immaculate Conception Catholic Church". So she is somewhat justified that at least it APPEARS she's a member of that one true Church, and has the one true Faith. Now whether that's true or not is open for debate, and touches on things we can't know for sure like the "good will" of the soul in question. I don't see how we can discuss that either, since we can't know for sure what's inside a person's soul. Do they suspect something is wrong? Have they rejected the Truth? Only God knows.
Matthew