This is from someone who spent seven years as a so-called "traditionalist Catholic" (personally, I abhor the term as a redudancy, since any Catholic is definitionally traditionalist).
Ah, pseudo-intellectualism! Apparently, this bloke is not paying too much attention to what the Vatican has spewed forth for over four decades now...as it is decidedly novel (or has no idea about what things were like before V2, or just cannot think very clearly, etc). What was he doing for those seven years? He clearly learned nothing -- except to despise those with whom he has come to disagree, for whatever reason.
He "chuckles" when he merely reads the OI? HeL-Lo-O, McFly! You clearly have an ax to grind, and are quite glad with yourself for grinding it.
Does the following come from the chap who is "definitionally traditional"?
First, when I talk about "extreme and erroneous views" I am talking about those views which directly and objectively contravene what the Catholic Church actually directs. Views like the EF is intrinsically better than OF; CIH is always bad/evil; the OF is "sacrilegious" or an "abomination"; female altar servers is always bad/evil; receiving communion while standing is bad/evil; receiving communion while standing is always better; guitars, pianos and violins are bad/evil, etc. etc.
If he agrees /has no problem with these things that he is here presenting as examples of "extreme views", then he is hardly traditional, definitionally or otherwise -- but is merely full of sh*t and far too arrogant to see it.