His "theological conclusions" are no more than opinions.
Prove it.
You must be a simpleton. It is YOU who need to show how his opinion is something authoritative. I don't need to prove it isn't.
Nope, the article lays out clear theological conclusions/dogmatic facts proving how they are true etc.
So far you have not even cited one thing from the article, posted it here and said "look, this is false because so and so".
That's interesting, how you have not SHOWN anything, but only keep asserting that it is false.
It's like the Dimonds supposedly "refuting" The Grain of Incense with a "common sense" analogy but zero theological backing/proof whatsoever.
I never said anything was "false," only that it was an opinion condemning "opinionism."
Bp Sanborn is playing a game. He's trying to convince you that anybody who recognizes his own limitations and does not condemn those who offer different opinions is guilty of thinking truth is just a matter of opinion.
Topic: For SJB - are the sspx Priests and Bishops theologians? (Read 2895 times)