The only way to roll is sedeprivationism :cool:
...while still supporting Bishop Williamson :cheers:
So-called sedeprivationism solidly professes that, "the Vatican II popes are not popes".
And it also posits that the Conciliar popes are (only) material popes. Some goes with all of the new order bishops and priests. You forgot to mention that essential part.
Nobody takes you serious. How can they after reading your illogical, deceitful, discord-sowing comments? Look at yourself (profile reputation). It's a big fat goose egg. A "0", notwithstanding the fact that you have well over 1,000 posts. :roll-laugh1:
While it says they are popes "materially" the theory still say they are categorically NOT popes.
But it says they can still confer Holy Orders and consecrate the Sacraments, as well as render various organizational decisions, while their heresy and unfolding apostasy nullifies them as real Shepherds in the Church, thus no Catholic is obligated to be obedient to the falsehoods that they promulgate. Moreover, their declarations of sainthood are not to be honored, nor believed, except for real saints who, due to their true saintliness and the material effects of Beatification / Canonization, do become genuinely canonized in the Church and in the Eyes of the Lord.
Bp. Williamson is totally against that, and you forgot to say that!
In terms of
semantic description of the Church's Crisis, and the response to it, Bp Williamson differs from sede
privationism. However, logically, privationism and Bp Williamson essentially hold the same positions, at least for the most part. The key difference, however, is that privationism logically defines it's position, and describes the Crisis, much better than Bp Williamson. There will be no alliance because of what Bp Sanborn did to Archbishop Lefebvre - shamefully bringing a civil suit against the great Archbishop Lefebvre. Old Code of Canon Law states it's forbidden for anyone to bring a civil suit against a bishop.