Mr. Ibryani is probably the most radical schismatic that I have ever seen. He says that he is "investigating" Gregory XVI. Vatican I was an invalid Council, Pius IX is most likely an apostate "anti-Pope" and it goes without saying that he sees his Guardian Angel. He happens to be way too much into private prophecy.
Now whether anti-Pope John Paul II was the one and only real anti-Christ. I would say no, but he might be the beast.
It has been a little while since I have actually re-visited that topic. So maybe some of you out there that might be more aware might be able to help me with this. Please cite your sources, it goes without saying I don't accept dubious claims.
What is the difference between the false prophet, the beast and the Anti-Christ. What is their timeline order between them? I appreciate it, thanks.