It's 2025 (almost 2026)....can we all put down the pitchforks and recognize that the last 30 years of battles between R&R (i.e. +Fellay, the pro-new-rome boy) and "extreme" Sedevacantism (i.e. Fr Cekada, Bishop Dolan) are over?

The divide should be over.  Let's move on, from Boomerism, pig-headedness, "market share" thinking, and close-mindedness.

30 years has proven this Trad civil-war solves nothing.

(+ABL's R&R) vs (sedevacantism)...who cares?  Valid priests, valid sacraments == Tradition.  THAT'S WHAT MATTERS.

Let's all grow up, be more mature than the Boomers and move on.  Tradition depends on it.

Yes, that's why I advocate a return to a simpler time in the history of the Traditional Movement. When sedevacantism was limited to PERSONAL OPINION and PRIVATE SPECULATION, not one's whole identity.
When sedevacantists sat next to non-sedevacantists at the same Traditional chapels. Because it was just an opinion; why WOULDN'T they attend the same chapels?

Just like the gαys make a perverted hobby their whole identity -- I see a similar situation with some Sedevacantists, who make a single private theological opinion on the Crisis into their whole identity. They embrace the whole "sede culture": aloofness from other Trads, sectarianism, condemnation and attacks on non-sedes, etc.

Yes, that's why I advocate a return to a simpler time in the history of the Traditional Movement. When sedevacantism was limited to PERSONAL OPINION and PRIVATE SPECULATION, not one's whole identity.
When sedevacantists sat next to non-sedevacantists at the same Traditional chapels. Because it was just an opinion; why WOULDN'T they attend the same chapels?

Just like the gαys make a perverted hobby their whole identity -- I see a similar situation with some Sedevacantists, who make a single private theological opinion on the Crisis into their whole identity. They embrace the whole "sede culture": aloofness from other Trads, sectarianism, condemnation and attacks on non-sedes, etc.

I agree 100%.   But…I think the pro-sspx side needs to start “calling a spade a spade” and say the v2 popes are heretics (ie like Fr Chazal did).  

The new-sspx’ers who WANT TO BE INDULT will revolt at the idea of calling the pope a heretic (mostly, due to human respect).

The classic-sspx’ers who FOLLOW +ABL, have no problem calling V2 a heresy and all those V2 popes as horrible heretics.  

The time has come for classic-sspx’ers to stand for Tradition and reject indultism, compromise and +Fellay’s lies.  

I don’t see “traditional Catholicism” as some big tent where we all hold hands and sing kumbaya - where it is seemingly okay that some of us are affirming grossly heretical positions because “we’re all traditional man! What’s important is that we stand up to the modernists!”

Heresy is heresy and heresy is evil. It must be called out. There isn’t five different faiths, there is ONE Catholic faith.

You don’t know history.  Trads in the 70s/80s were united against V2.  That was the enemy.  Not each other. 

I get that the new/sspx is quasi-indult and that makes things complicated. 

But if you find an issue with MATTHEW, who’s as far removed from the new/sspx (without being a Sede) as can be, the problem is YOU.  Your view is NEW.  IT’S DIVISIVE.  IT’S STUPID.  

You mean R&R vs +ABL’s sedevacantism surely

  Doesn't matter.  Are these camps against V2 and the new mass?  Then, they are Trads.  Forget the OLD labels.  The new label should be: 

Trad = anti-V2, anti-new mass, anti-new-sacraments.

MATTA == Make All Traditionalists, Traditional again.

You mean R&R vs +ABL’s sedevacantism surely

+ABL's sedevacantism?

Isn't that kind of like saying "Crayolcold's h0Ɩ0cαųst museum"?

Because neither of those things exist (I hope).

What does subjection to the Pope entail? Can any Traditional Catholic give an example of a specific occasion in their life when their subjection to the Pope was manifest?