Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: To Sedes: Time's Running Out to Elect a New Pope!!!  (Read 9974 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: To Sedes: Time's Running Out to Elect a New Pope!!!
« Reply #15 on: February 21, 2021, 08:34:30 AM »
Yes, every salvation effected is always through the Grace given by the Holy Spirit. So if infants baptized by Protestants are saved, as evidently they are, it follows that the Spirit of Christ has indeed not refrained from using the separated communities, in those particular cases, as means of salvation. The efficacy of those means like Baptism is only because of the fullness of grace and salvation entrusted only to the Catholic Church. So we can say the Spirit of Christ uses e.g. Orthodox Priests who also baptize infants as "extraordinary means". The Eastern Churches also give Holy Communion, in both kinds, to freshly baptized and newly chrismated Christian children. So it's certainly possible to interpret those texts within a hermeneutic of continuity, as Pope Benedict XVI asked.

Now, as for this thread, I'm not mocking anyone. There were sedes, even on this forum, who said the End of the Crisis is guaranteed before the death of the last Pope Pius XII appointed Bishops. Indeed, it would have been, if SVism is true. But that hasn't happened.

So what now? Those who believe in SVism can just remain without Popes forever? Even in those instances where interregnums were prolonged for mere months, the Cardinals were urged by faithful and others to get their act together and quickly elect a Pope. The Church has always had the conviction that interregna are not meant to last forever, and even in the GWS when there were opposing Papal Claimants to the True Pope, the Church made very strenuous efforts, including gathering in Councils, to end the crisis and get a Pope with UEA. So if SVism is true, where are these efforts today?

Misereremei, do you have a quote saying any other method is possible? Also, if a few vagrant bishops here and there, without office and jurisdiction, make a declaration, it will not be binding. The sede bishops themselves admit they don't have authority to bind consciences. But if it is not binding, how can a new Pope be elected?

"Pope Michael" type situations will result. Some will accept. And some won't. That is why the Bishops with Ordinary Jurisdiction, with Formal Authority to bind conscience, the only Judges with Jurisdiction in the Church by divine law apart from the Pope, must take action.

But they have not. As I argued in another thread citing Fr. Hunter, the unanimous recognition by the Bishops is proof SVism is mistaken.

Ladislaus, how does Sedeprivationism solve the issue? Heretics cannot appoint Bishops to offices. The Eastern Patriarchs, after they became heretics, as Fr. Gueranger says, lost the authority to appoint Bishops to offices, such that those appointed by them lack authority. If the Popes have all been heretics, wouldn't the same apply to them? cuм Ex also says appointees by heretics lack authority.

Myrna, as you know, I don't believe in post-1958-sedevacantism. But if I did believe even in post-2013-sedevacantism, e.g. if I believed Pope Francis was invalidly elected, I would be doing everything I could to urge the Cardinals and Bishops to take action to end the crisis.

If I had believed in post-1958 or 63-year-SVism up to the very point the last Pope Pius XII appointed Bishop died, I would have changed my opinion on it the moment he did.

How can it be otherwise? I know we will perhaps disagree, but to me the dogma of St. Peter's Perpetual Successors is incompatible with the idea of a sede vacante lasting indefinitely. And yet the idea of an indefinite sede vacante is what some SVs have seemingly resigned themselves to. I am only saying one's actions must be consistent with one's beliefs. If one believes in SVism, one must act accordingly. One must urge those who can Judge - the Bishops with Jurisdiction - to do so. 

Can anyone show any example of a Church Doctor who envisioned 6+Popes for 60 years being heretics without the Church taking action? Whenever the Doctors discussed the possibility, they spoke of the Church taking action immediately - and certainly within the lifetime of the Pope. Not after 60+ years.

May God bless and guide us all as we discern how best to remain faithful to Him. May we all live and die as faithful Roman Catholics. Amen.

Re: To Sedes: Time's Running Out to Elect a New Pope!!!
« Reply #16 on: February 21, 2021, 09:16:54 AM »

Why do you keep asking these questions?  You really think you're gonna convince someone to line up behind Jorge, the guy who ok'd birth control and denied hell?

"Come out from her my people lest you take share in her sins and recieve of her plagues."


Re: To Sedes: Time's Running Out to Elect a New Pope!!!
« Reply #17 on: February 21, 2021, 10:20:04 AM »
bergoglio's teaching- lies and deceptions

Hell
TEACHING OF the ONE, HOLY, CATHOLIC, and APOSTOLIC CHURCH and TRUTH
Interview with the Italian newspaper La Repubblica25, Mar 28, 2018: When asked where bad souls are punished, Francis replied: “They are not punished, those who repent obtain the forgiveness of God and enter the rank of souls who contemplate him, but those who do not repent and cannot therefore be forgiven disappear. There is no hell, there is the disappearance of sinful souls.
  
"Moreover, we declare that according to the common arrangement of God, the souls of those who depart in actual mortal sin immєdιαtely after their death descend to hell where they are tortured by infernal punishments..." Pope Benedict XII, Benedictus Deus, 1336


Contraception
In-flight interview from Mexico15, Feb 17, 2016: “The great Paul VI, in a difficult situation in Africa, permitted nuns to use a form of artificial contraceptives in cases of rape.....On the other hand, avoiding pregnancy is not an absolute evil. In certain cases, as in this one (the Zika virus outbreak), or in the one I mentioned of Blessed Paul VI, it was clear.”
  
"But no reason, however grave, may be put forward by which anything intrinsically against nature may become conformable to nature and morally good. Since, therefore, the conjugal act is destined primarily by nature for the begetting of children, those who in exercising it deliberately frustrate its natural power and purpose sin against nature and commit a deed which is shameful and intrinsically vicious."
 "...any use whatsoever of matrimony exercised in such a way that the act is deliberately frustrated in its natural power to generate life is an offense against the law of God and of nature, and those who indulge in such are branded with the guilt of a grave sin."
 "...No difficulty can arise that justifies the putting aside of the law of God which forbids all acts intrinsically evil." Pope Pius XI, Encyclical On Christian Marriage, Dec 31, 1930
  
 "A negative precept of natural law which prohibits a thing intrinsically evil can never be lawfully transgressed not even under the influence of the fear of death, (Lib. I, tr. ii, c. iv, dub. 2, n. 1) So that it is not lawful to do a thing which is wrong in itself, even to escape death" Catholic Encyclopedia, Hermann Busembaum
  


Re: To Sedes: Time's Running Out to Elect a New Pope!!!
« Reply #18 on: February 21, 2021, 10:22:44 AM »

Myrna, as you know, I don't believe in post-1958-sedevacantism. But if I did believe even in post-2013-sedevacantism, e.g. if I believed Pope Francis was invalidly elected, I would be doing everything I could to urge the Cardinals and Bishops to take action to end the crisis.

If I had believed in post-1958 or 63-year-SVism up to the very point the last Pope Pius XII appointed Bishop died, I would have changed my opinion on it the moment he did.

How can it be otherwise? I know we will perhaps disagree, but to me the dogma of St. Peter's Perpetual Successors is incompatible with the idea of a sede vacante lasting indefinitely. And yet the idea of an indefinite sede vacante is what some SVs have seemingly resigned themselves to. I am only saying one's actions must be consistent with one's beliefs. If one believes in SVism, one must act accordingly. One must urge those who can Judge - the Bishops with Jurisdiction - to do so.

Can anyone show any example of a Church Doctor who envisioned 6+Popes for 60 years being heretics without the Church taking action? Whenever the Doctors discussed the possibility, they spoke of the Church taking action immєdιαtely - and certainly within the lifetime of the Pope. Not after 60+ years.

May God bless and guide us all as we discern how best to remain faithful to Him. May we all live and die as faithful Roman Catholics. Amen.
All your arguments prove that there is NO TRUE POPE, the Church ( and my definition of Church excludes Vatican II).  The only victory of Vll is it successfully resulted in it being smaller.  The Church began small and perhaps it will remain small in numbers as God told us.

Luke 18;8 "I say to you, that he will quickly revenge them. But yet the Son of man, when he cometh, shall he find, think you, faith on earth?"  If you care to read a Catholic explanation of that check of the CATHOLIC link https://johnblood.gitlab.io/haydock/id82.html


It explains also why bother asking Modernists who possess our Vatican to ask them to end the crisis when they like it the way it is.  

Yes, SVanct are resigned to wait for God to end the crisis, what is wrong with that?   Jesus Christ is the Head of His Church and it is His Will we are separated when the Shepherd is struck the sheep will scatter. The Vicar of Christ has been struck by MODERNIST and the sheep are scattered just as we were warned.  

God is NOT pleased when someone like you comes along and objects to His flock who are trying to KEEP THE FAITH.   Where does it say, that we all have to become theologians these days, that we all must  know the answer to end this crisis; we must as God said, "WATCH AND PRAY."

Re: To Sedes: Time's Running Out to Elect a New Pope!!!
« Reply #19 on: February 21, 2021, 12:25:27 PM »
Please show where Bergoglio ok'd birth control and denied hell.
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/pope-francis-birth-control-zika-219437
He ok'd contraception for people in Zika regions.