"Sounds to me like you do alot of day dreaming, trying to connect the dots with the haze of conspiracy, and not alot of actual study regardind dogmatic theology.  You're mind seems to be very close to mush, logically speaking."

I will give you this, Caminus.  You are good at what you do.  You know how to go for the jugular and attack weaknesses.  

What can I say against this?  My being a daydreamer or intellectual dilettante or having a "pattern-making" mind doesn't mean that I am not right about what I say, but it's a nice aspersion to use to discredit me with whoever might be reading, because there is some truth to it.  Congrats.  You are very intuitive.  I was actually warned today in a letter that precisely this would happen.

What you said isn't false, exactly, but it's as if, say, Mary Magdalene were trying to convert you after the death of Christ, and you said, "Why should I listen to you?  You're the village whore."  You're simply using whatever weakness in my character you can find against me, and hoping that will blacken my ( screen ) name.

Luckily there are other sedes out there who use the scholastic method more thoroughly than I do, and I do not try to compete with them.  

Now I am being accused of being too spontaneous, whereas before I was too pretentious.  Now I am unscholastic, when before I was an insufferable bookworm.  But this may be a blessing in disguise.  I think God kept me a bit worldly like Augustine so that I would have a different angle on this debate.  I see someone like John Lane fumbling through books to find quotes and missing simple facts that are right under his nose, or entirely omitting the very existence of Freemasons and conspirators.  I'm not sure books are the answer here.  No book written 500 years ago can describe our unique historical situation.

I grant to myself a certain freedom to speak of cօռspιʀαcιҽs precisely because I am not a clergyman, and so I don't have to be afraid to be called a "nut."  I expect it.  And I am absolutely certain that anyone at this stage in history that doesn't believe in cօռspιʀαcιҽs is the real nut. The devil is running out of ideas and the "playing both sides" tactic he uses with Vatican II/SSPX is now painfully obvious ( there's that word again ).

As for the rest of your post --

"Now for the last time, please demonstrate how asserting that Muslims worship the same God, an assertion of concrete fact regarding a particular group of people, directly denies an article of faith."

It doesn't say Muslims worship "the same god."  With your usual shameless pretense you are acting as if Lumen Gentium says only that all Muslims worship the same God i.e. Allah.  Actually it says "together with US ( Catholics ) they worship the one true God."  That is, Muslims and Catholics have the SAME God.

For the millionth time, just as with the quote from JPII about the Old Covenant, this is saying that Christ's sacrifice was not necessary and not the only path to salvation.  I do not want to be part of a "Church" making that assumption because I can guarantee you, those who support such a horrible, impious lie by their presence in a Novus Ordo death-chamber, patiently listening to such things, are in grave danger.  It also implies -- more than implies -- that it is not necessary for EVERY MAN to submit to the Holy Catholic Church as the One True Church that is guided by the Holy Spirit.  

By doing this, they eliminated two of the four marks.  No longer is their Church One and Catholic ( universal ), because there are other ways to be saved.  And after toppling these two marks, the other two fell on their own.  This Catholic-seeming sect cannot be apostolic because how can a Catholic who believes in only one path to salvation try to convert people to an unnecessary, optional Church?  That is like trying to fly in a hot-air balloon that you've filled with mustard.  The apostolic mission has been totally robbed of urgency.  And all of this of course defeats the holiness of the Church.  

Luckily it is a fake Church that is missing the four marks.  The real one still has them.

I hope the hour of your insane defiance is almost up and that, instead of pipsqueaks like me reaching for their keyboards, Michael the Archangel is reaching for his trumpet.  How much longer will this go on?

... this is saying that Christ's sacrifice was not necessary and not the only path to salvation.

That is just flat out wrong, Raoul76. Saying that "Muslims worship the same God as Catholics, i.e., Muslims worship God who is 'one and merciful' even if they deny the Trinity" is not the same as saying that "Christ's sacrifice was not necessary and not the only path to salvation". You are making an absurd logical leap here. The first statement is a profound theological error of fact. The second statement is a manifest denial of a specific article of the Catholic Faith.

The question is: what is "this opinion" to which Mortalium Animos refers.

Read the encyclical.  Then, read JP2's works.  The opinion is that all religions are more or less praiseworthy - something JP2 stated word for word multiple times.  He put his money where his despicable mouth was, too, joining MYRIAD actions to his insane statements.

"...cogitatione, verbo, et opere..."

If Pope Agatho thought that Honorious was an "instrument of the Devil" for his mere private accomodation of one heresy, what would he have thought of John Paul?

Why, that he was an apostate antipope, of course. :rolleyes: