The Pope said that statement rests upon another opinion which he stated just prior. You have to determine the presence of that opinion, not whether he made the statement that all religions are good and praiseworthy. You'll get no argument from me on that score. So egregious was his error on this that he thought the Council "re-defined" the nature of the Church. Assisi was but a manifestation of his ecclesiology. Don't make the mistake of thinking that just because I defend him from accusations of apostasy, I defend him pure and simple. Far from it. If there was anyone that could be suspected of heresy it was him. In fact, if one were to hold him as a heretic, I wouldn't be surprised at all, but overstating the case doesn't help. John Paul was absolutely the worse Pope in history. If Pope Agatho thought that Honorious was an "instrument of the Devil" for his mere private accomodation of one heresy, what would he have thought of John Paul?