Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: To all the "sedes"  (Read 3306 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline roscoe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7610
  • Reputation: +617/-404
  • Gender: Male
To all the "sedes"
« Reply #15 on: June 20, 2009, 11:32:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • That is because he WAS a true Pope.
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'


    Offline Dulcamara

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1067
    • Reputation: +38/-0
    • Gender: Female
    To all the "sedes"
    « Reply #16 on: June 20, 2009, 11:35:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Just like this one.  :rolleyes:
    I renounce any and all of my former views against what the Church through Pope Leo XIII said, "This, then, is the teaching of the Catholic Church ...no one of the several forms of government is in itself condemned, inasmuch as none of them contains anythi


    Offline Prodinoscopus

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 149
    • Reputation: +12/-0
    • Gender: Male
    To all the "sedes"
    « Reply #17 on: June 20, 2009, 11:36:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: roscoe
    That is because he WAS a true Pope.

    I think that the point here is that St. Catherine would never adopt the sedevacantist thesis. Feel free to interpret her writings otherwise if you wish, but I think that you will have to distort her intentions in order to do so.
    Exile in Novus Ordo land ... please pray for me!

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7610
    • Reputation: +617/-404
    • Gender: Male
    To all the "sedes"
    « Reply #18 on: June 20, 2009, 11:37:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • None of the GWS Popes( with the prob exception of the worthless Urban VI(6?) are anti-popes so of course St Catherine defers to them. This is not the case today.
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7610
    • Reputation: +617/-404
    • Gender: Male
    To all the "sedes"
    « Reply #19 on: June 20, 2009, 11:44:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Prodinoscopus
    Quote from: roscoe
    That is because he WAS a true Pope.

    I think that the point here is that St. Catherine would never adopt the sedevacantist thesis. Feel free to interpret her writings otherwise if you wish, but I think that you will have to distort her intentions in order to do so.
    I do not think you are qualified to say what St Catherine would or would not have done re: todays v2 anti-church. Be that as it may I AM NOT A 'SEDE VACANTIST'  AND IN FACT HAD NEVER HEARD OF SUCH A THING until a visit to the TCW site.

    The evidence is overwhelming that Greg XVII was truely elected Pope in 1958 and was such until 1989.
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'


    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    To all the "sedes"
    « Reply #20 on: June 20, 2009, 11:55:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Hold on.  DeMaistre, stop making dramatic pronouncements and just take some time out to think.  

    First, please give us this Catherine of Siena quote where she talks about serving the Pope even if he is a devil.  Without even knowing the quote I can tell you almost 100% that the gist of it, the thinking behind it is, "The office of Pope is not dependent on the personal morality of the one holding it."  

    I have to take issue even with Dawn here, who I almost always agree with.  She says that these can't be Popes because they are protecting child molesters... Actually, EVEN THEN they could still be Popes.  Popes in the Middle Ages, which sedes tend to idealize, protected priests who were living openly with women.  There is even a term for this:  Concubinage!  Even Popes with heroic reputations like Pius X did next to nothing to clean house and expunge the creeping liberal rot.

    I want to make this very clear.  The reason I hold the sedevacantist position is not because of idealism.  The Church has never been perfect IN ITS MEMBERS.  It is only perfect in itself, as the spotless Bride of Christ.  So Catherine of Siena is right to support the Pope even if he were a child-molesting, nun-raping brute.  But would she support someone who WASN'T EVEN CATHOLIC?  And therefore is not Pope at all?  Be careful before you answer, or the ghost of Catherine might give you a painful noogie.  

    The Catholic Church is God's means of harvesting souls, of collecting the wheat.  Paul VI -- who you are absolutely right in your assessment of -- was a revolutionary, but he knew the source of the Church's power, that it was One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic.  Being the devil that he was, he wanted to eliminate its ONENESS.  Suddenly other religions became acceptable, seeds of the truth, or alternate paths to heaven.  Muslims share the same God as Catholics.  The Old Covenant with the Jєωs was never rescinded.

    Do you see what he did here?  He de-boned the whole chicken!  

    Jesus came precisely to DESTROY the Old Covenant.  God, from this point on, worked ONLY through the Catholic Church.  It is that new covenant that gives the Catholic Church its unique mission and power.  The way the fake Popes talk now, the Catholic Church is a really good Church, and it certainly has a special longevity that sets it apart -- but others are good too, and besides, times have changed.  How do you convert someone to that?  It's like taking the air out of your car tires and then trying to go for a drive.  

    Imagine a missionary in Japan in the 19th century.  He is preaching to the heathens and telling them that God has come in the flesh.  He tells them they MUST convert to God's One Church, the Catholic Church, to be saved.  His preaching is firm, stable and coherent.  

    Now imagine yourself trying to convert someone to the Church under Ratzinger.  Just feel how unsolid it has become, how vague.  It is like the difference between a Sealy Posturepedic Mattress and a waterbed.  What would you say to this African/Japanese/Indian man to convert him, how would you make him feel the urgency of converting?  This false "Catholic" Church now is an indefinable SOMETHING, held together by vague self-worship ( 666, the cult of man ) and feel-good vibes, barely any different than an Agape Church.  

    There is no urgency to it, no feeling that you must NECESSARILY accept its teachings for your salvation.  No one even knows what its teachings are anymore -- except that the one sin is to be traditional!  The Vatican II "priests" and "bishops" all, to a man, try to encourage this relativism and apathy.  That is why they stop people from kneeling or being reverent in any way.  It's why they harass people who want a Latin Mass and then give them a fake one to shut them up.

    DeMaistre, don't tangle yourself up.  If you go back into this non-Church, this impostor Church, this creature of alchemy and taxidermy, you can no longer say it is the ONE true Church because the new non-Popes themselves do not even teach that!  Follow your own logic to its conclusion.  If these are Popes you must believe their teaching.  But to try to follow their teaching and still remain Catholic is an impossibility.  

    The devil wants you to be as schizophrenic as he is and anyone remaining with these non-Popes must be necessarily that -- DOUBLE-MINDED and TWO-FACED.  Hence, Vatican TWO is in direct opposition with the ONE Catholic Church, who must be the sedevacantists.  We know the Church will last until the end, but we also know that almost no one will be left who still keeps the faith ( "When the Son of Man returns to Earth, will He find faith?" )  

    The reason why so few believe the truth, is because the truth is so unbelievable.  Could all these people really be deluded?  What about that nice girl who fixes roast beef sandwiches at Subway, is she going to burn eternally?  What about all those pretty young couples, aren't they innocent?  And all those people in Africa, in Asia?  

    Make no mistake -- what is happening is HIGHLY disturbing and sickening.  Words cannot express just how awful it is.  But this is the hour of the devil, prophesied from all eternity.  It doesn't mean that God isn't fair.  Think -- ANY of these people could do what we're doing and research.  They have the Internet.  They know about traditional Catholics from Mel Gibson.  

    NO ONE CARES.  HUMANITY IS IN REBELLION.

    You must understand that we wouldn't BE here unless, over centuries, people had ceased to pay attention to the truth.  First they want relaxed rules.  Then they want to believe that all men are saved.  Eventually they are piling one mortal sin on top of the other without fear.  And then it's over.  "Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying."  

    You worry about the people in Asia.  But what about all the Asian people here?  Why are you one of the handful of Vietnamese sedevacantists?  Because THEY DON'T CARE.  I am Polish-Spanish:  Why are the Poles, this great Catholic people, literally kissing the star of David on a Jєωιѕн tombstone of a "h0Ɩ0cαųst" victim after filing out of "Church" ( they do this in Poland )?  THEY DON'T CARE.  Why have the Spanish, another great Catholic nation, less than one hundred years after the glorious Spanish cινιℓ ωαr, become nothing but a nation of fornicators and club-hoppers?  THEY DON'T CARE.

    This is the mystery of iniquity, of apostasy.  Take it from me.  I thought I was going to save the world until I understood.  You cannot stop it.  It is part of God's plan.  We can't interfere, we can't change anything.  We are here to observe, to pray and to suffer -- that is it.  
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.

    Offline Prodinoscopus

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 149
    • Reputation: +12/-0
    • Gender: Male
    To all the "sedes"
    « Reply #21 on: June 20, 2009, 11:58:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: roscoe
    I do not think you are qualified to say what St Catherine would or would not have done re: todays v2 anti-church.

    Wow, that's a real discussion stopper.

    Yet somehow you are qualified to say that "the evidence is overwhelming" that someone else was elected Pope in 1958.

    I defer to your vastly superior qualifications, mr. roscoe.

    :fryingpan:

    Good night!
    Exile in Novus Ordo land ... please pray for me!

    Offline Prodinoscopus

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 149
    • Reputation: +12/-0
    • Gender: Male
    To all the "sedes"
    « Reply #22 on: June 21, 2009, 12:27:08 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Raoul76
    Why are the Poles, this great Catholic people, literally kissing the star of David on a Jєωιѕн tombstone of a "h0Ɩ0cαųst" victim after filing out of "Church" ( they do this in Poland )?

    Is that for real? I don't doubt it, I've just never heard of it. Can you please provide more details?

    I like your passion and conviction, Raoul76, even if we disagree. I certainly don't question your intentions.

    Quote
    We are here to observe, to pray and to suffer -- that is it.

    I think that we can agree on that point.
    Exile in Novus Ordo land ... please pray for me!


    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    To all the "sedes"
    « Reply #23 on: June 21, 2009, 12:49:53 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Some other quotes from Catherine of Siena:

    "Oh dearest father, fall in love with this truth so that you may be a pillar in the mystic body of holy church, where this truth must be administered. For truth is in her, and because truth is in her it must be administered by truthful persons, persons who are in love with truth and enlightened by it -- not persons who are insensitive to and ignorant of it."

    "The pastors of holy church, to whom God has entrusted the care of souls, ought to be true shepherds who follow the good holy Shepherd who laid down and gave his life for his little sheep."

    I found the quote about laying on the bosom of the "incarnate devil" Pope.  I was right.  She's talking about a Pope who behaves badly.  Not a heretic.  Heretics can't be Popes.  

    A sinning Pope could be a devil incarnate, he could be a murderer with a large harem, and still be Catholic.  He would just go to confession.  That would be no different than the many, many examples of sinning Catholic kings.  Louis XIV was a womanizer yet he was Catholic, had mass said every day, etc.  Charlemagne, the great Catholic king, had the morals of an alley cat, and many historians say he committed incest.

    For all we know, there might have been a Pope who was like a Charlemagne.  It is theoretically possible anyway.  But as long as he didn't teach heresy that brought people to hell, that would be okay.  It is intellectual dishonesty to pretend that Catherine of Siena, who was all about Catholic truth, would not have seen the difference between a SINNING POPE and a HERETICAL "POPE."  The former is a case of human weakness.  The latter is an oxymoron.  

    Popes cannot be pertinacious heretics.  The closest we have to a heretical Pope is Honorius and all he did was sin by omission, once, in a private letter -- and in his case there is reason to believe he was unclear or undecided on the issues at hand.  Back then dogma was in the process of formation.  Now, it is fully-formed.  But to bring back the Old Covenant as still being valid wouldn't have even been plausible in A.D. 90.
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.

    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    To all the "sedes"
    « Reply #24 on: June 21, 2009, 01:05:49 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks Prodinoscopus.  I appreciate that.  

    Still, though I hate to sound all Catholic Martyr-y and return compliments with insults, considering the lies that SSPX tells in articles like "Is Sedevacantism Catholic," I can't relent when it comes to them, even after we've shared this tender moment.   :wink:  

    But I do understand why people are in SSPX, I think.  It attracts a certain pragmatic type that doesn't believe in cօռspιʀαcιҽs and just thinks these are "weak Popes."  My mom often says to me "Be patient with people, not everyone has your CONCEPTUAL mind."  And I do think it is my concept of history that makes me so confident about the sede position.  For me the takeover of the Church was inevitable and the culmination of a long process.  

    Those who live day-by-day -- as Christ recommends -- may not see this.  They may just see a general trend towards amorality in society and the Church bending to fit that.  They may not get that there is a  masterplan here.  But it becomes hard to defend even this position when the non-Popes teach that the Old Covenant still stands, for instance.  You don't have to understand the inner workings of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ to know that that is naked apostasy.
     
    The Polish thing was on YouTube.  I don't know how I'll find it again because it was in Polish and I was clicking around absentmindedly.  It showed Vatican II Catholics who leave the service, head over to a local Jєωιѕн cemetery, and bow their heads in front of a tombstone bearing the Star of David, one by one.  This after hearing a disgusting homily praising Jєωs to the skies and instilling guilt into the flock about the "h0Ɩ0cαųst."  
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7610
    • Reputation: +617/-404
    • Gender: Male
    To all the "sedes"
    « Reply #25 on: June 21, 2009, 01:47:48 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Prodinoscopus
    Quote from: roscoe
    I do not think you are qualified to say what St Catherine would or would not have done re: todays v2 anti-church.

    Wow, that's a real discussion stopper.

    Yet somehow you are qualified to say that "the evidence is overwhelming" that someone else was elected Pope in 1958.

    I defer to your vastly superior qualifications, mr. roscoe.

    :fryingpan:

    Good night!


    I certainly am qualified to say what I think re: v2 anti-popes as I am here and St Catherine is not.
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'


    Offline DeMaistre

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 343
    • Reputation: +15/-0
    • Gender: Male
    To all the "sedes"
    « Reply #26 on: June 21, 2009, 09:10:54 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Raoul76
    Hold on.  DeMaistre, stop making dramatic pronouncements and just take some time out to think.


    Actually, my cousin was pestering me to get off  the computer.  :smirk:  
    Quote

    First, please give us this Catherine of Siena quote where she talks about serving the Pope even if he is a devil.  Without even knowing the quote I can tell you almost 100% that the gist of it, the thinking behind it is, "The office of Pope is not dependent on the personal morality of the one holding it."  


    Even if the Pope were Satan incarnate, we ought not to raise our heads against him, but calmly lie down to rest on his bosom. He who rebels against our Father is condemned to death, for that which we do to him we do to Christ: we honour Christ if we honour the Pope; we dishonour Christ if we dishonour the Pope. I know very well that many defend themselves by boasting: "They are so corrupt, and work all manner of evil!" But God has commanded that, even if the priests, the pastors, and Christ-on-earth were incarnate devils, we be obedient and subject to them, not for their sakes, but for the sake of God, and out of obedience to Him. ~ Saint Catherine of Sienna
    Quote

    I have to take issue even with Dawn here, who I almost always agree with.  She says that these can't be Popes because they are protecting child molesters... Actually, EVEN THEN they could still be Popes.  Popes in the Middle Ages, which sedes tend to idealize, protected priests who were living openly with women.  There is even a term for this:  Concubinage!  Even Popes with heroic reputations like Pius X did next to nothing to clean house and expunge the creeping liberal rot.


    That's why I say that only a disgusting heretic can be declared anti-pope.
    Quote

    I want to make this very clear.  The reason I hold the sedevacantist position is not because of idealism.  The Church has never been perfect IN ITS MEMBERS.  It is only perfect in itself, as the spotless Bride of Christ.  So Catherine of Siena is right to support the Pope even if he were a child-molesting, nun-raping brute.  But would she support someone who WASN'T EVEN CATHOLIC?  And therefore is not Pope at all?  Be careful before you answer, or the ghost of Catherine might give you a painful noogie.  


    I am following...
    Quote


    The Catholic Church is God's means of harvesting souls, of collecting the wheat.  Paul VI -- who you are absolutely right in your assessment of -- was a revolutionary, but he knew the source of the Church's power, that it was One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic.  Being the devil that he was, he wanted to eliminate its ONENESS.  Suddenly other religions became acceptable, seeds of the truth, or alternate paths to heaven.  Muslims share the same God as Catholics.  The Old Covenant with the Jєωs was never rescinded.

    Do you see what he did here?  He de-boned the whole chicken!  

    Jesus came precisely to DESTROY the Old Covenant.  God, from this point on, worked ONLY through the Catholic Church.  It is that new covenant that gives the Catholic Church its unique mission and power.  The way the fake Popes talk now, the Catholic Church is a really good Church, and it certainly has a special longevity that sets it apart -- but others are good too, and besides, times have changed.  How do you convert someone to that?  It's like taking the air out of your car tires and then trying to go for a drive.  


    I understand.
    Quote

    Imagine a missionary in Japan in the 19th century.  He is preaching to the heathens and telling them that God has come in the flesh.  He tells them they MUST convert to God's One Church, the Catholic Church, to be saved.  His preaching is firm, stable and coherent.  

    Now imagine yourself trying to convert someone to the Church under Ratzinger.  Just feel how unsolid it has become, how vague.  It is like the difference between a Sealy Posturepedic Mattress and a waterbed.  What would you say to this African/Japanese/Indian man to convert him, how would you make him feel the urgency of converting?  This false "Catholic" Church now is an indefinable SOMETHING, held together by vague self-worship ( 666, the cult of man ) and feel-good vibes, barely any different than an Agape Church.  


    I know this all to well.
    Quote


    There is no urgency to it, no feeling that you must NECESSARILY accept its teachings for your salvation.  No one even knows what its teachings are anymore -- except that the one sin is to be traditional!  The Vatican II "priests" and "bishops" all, to a man, try to encourage this relativism and apathy.  That is why they stop people from kneeling or being reverent in any way.  It's why they harass people who want a Latin Mass and then give them a fake one to shut them up.


    I've had a lot of experience with family members discouraging me to go to Latin Mass.
    Quote


    DeMaistre, don't tangle yourself up.  If you go back into this non-Church, this impostor Church, this creature of alchemy and taxidermy, you can no longer say it is the ONE true Church because the new non-Popes themselves do not even teach that!  Follow your own logic to its conclusion.  If these are Popes you must believe their teaching.  But to try to follow their teaching and still remain Catholic is an impossibility.  

    The devil wants you to be as schizophrenic as he is and anyone remaining with these non-Popes must be necessarily that -- DOUBLE-MINDED and TWO-FACED.  Hence, Vatican TWO is in direct opposition with the ONE Catholic Church, who must be the sedevacantists.  We know the Church will last until the end, but we also know that almost no one will be left who still keeps the faith ( "When the Son of Man returns to Earth, will He find faith?" )  


    I realise that, that is why I am having trouble reconciling the St. Catherine quote with the current situation.
    Quote

    The reason why so few believe the truth, is because the truth is so unbelievable.  Could all these people really be deluded?  What about that nice girl who fixes roast beef sandwiches at Subway, is she going to burn eternally?  What about all those pretty young couples, aren't they innocent?  And all those people in Africa, in Asia?  


    I've been thinking of that lately, and it is amazing isn't it? That almost everybody that you meet will go to Hell.
    Quote

    Make no mistake -- what is happening is HIGHLY disturbing and sickening.  Words cannot express just how awful it is.  But this is the hour of the devil, prophesied from all eternity.  It doesn't mean that God isn't fair.  Think -- ANY of these people could do what we're doing and research.  They have the Internet.  They know about traditional Catholics from Mel Gibson.  

    NO ONE CARES.  HUMANITY IS IN REBELLION.

    You must understand that we wouldn't BE here unless, over centuries, people had ceased to pay attention to the truth.  First they want relaxed rules.  Then they want to believe that all men are saved.  Eventually they are piling one mortal sin on top of the other without fear.  And then it's over.  "Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying."  


    Here you are completely right. No one cares about religion anymore. Even the seemingly "pious" ones often give one hand to the world.
    Quote

    You worry about the people in Asia.  But what about all the Asian people here?  Why are you one of the handful of Vietnamese sedevacantists?  Because THEY DON'T CARE.  I am Polish-Spanish:  Why are the Poles, this great Catholic people, literally kissing the star of David on a Jєωιѕн tombstone of a "h0Ɩ0cαųst" victim after filing out of "Church" ( they do this in Poland )?  THEY DON'T CARE.  Why have the Spanish, another great Catholic nation, less than one hundred years after the glorious Spanish cινιℓ ωαr, become nothing but a nation of fornicators and club-hoppers?  THEY DON'T CARE.


    I agree. But in Viet Nam, infidels are converting to the Novus Ordo faith in great numbers, some walking for days on end to go to "Mass" on Holy Days. Recently there were massive Catholic protests in Ha Noi (wait no, about a year ago) that was shut down by who? That Vatican. I mean, if I actually learned my language to enough to translate a few books into Vietnamese, and find a way to distribute them, then I am sure that I  can convert more than a few people. Wait until they know that these men are Communists that have sold them out.

    Quote
    This is the mystery of iniquity, of apostasy.  Take it from me.  I thought I was going to save the world until I understood.  You cannot stop it.  It is part of God's plan.  We can't interfere, we can't change anything.  We are here to observe, to pray and to suffer -- that is it.  


    You job is also to evangelize. I'm not out to save the world, just to try to help people of good will that live under the spiritual fog that is so common today.

    Offline DeMaistre

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 343
    • Reputation: +15/-0
    • Gender: Male
    To all the "sedes"
    « Reply #27 on: June 21, 2009, 09:13:54 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Prodinoscopus
    By the way, I have bookmarked Catholic Tradition under my favorites.  While there, I noticed the complete quote from St. Catherine.  Very sobering.  She corrected the Pope, firmly, yet as a loving daughter.  A lesson there for all of us: sedes, SSPXers, and disaffected exiles in Novus Ordo land.

    God bless!


    Thank you! Its still a work in progress. I need to finish adding all the sermons of the Cure d'Ars and then work on adding more writings and lives of the Saints. It takes a long time. I'm also going to give it a face-lift soon....

    Offline DeMaistre

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 343
    • Reputation: +15/-0
    • Gender: Male
    To all the "sedes"
    « Reply #28 on: June 21, 2009, 12:02:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I changed the URL, by the way:

    http://mementomori1994.blogspot.com/

    Offline CM

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2726
    • Reputation: +1/-0
    • Gender: Male
    To all the "sedes"
    « Reply #29 on: June 21, 2009, 10:00:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Raoul76
    BUT TEACHING HERESY PERSISTENTLY HE CANNOT EVEN BE CATHOLIC.  Let alone the Pope.


    And yet Benedict XV somehow is, in your mind.