Author Topic: To all the "sedes" (Read 5688 times)

roscoe · « **Reply #15 on:** June 20, 2009, 11:32:01 PM »

That is because he WAS a true Pope.

Dulcamara · « **Reply #16 on:** June 20, 2009, 11:35:30 PM »

Just like this one. :rolleyes:

Prodinoscopus · « **Reply #17 on:** June 20, 2009, 11:36:19 PM »

Quote from: roscoe

That is because he WAS a true Pope.

I think that the point here is that St. Catherine would never adopt the sedevacantist thesis. Feel free to interpret her writings otherwise if you wish, but I think that you will have to distort her intentions in order to do so.

roscoe · « **Reply #18 on:** June 20, 2009, 11:37:03 PM »

None of the GWS Popes( with the prob exception of the worthless Urban VI(6?) are anti-popes so of course St Catherine defers to them. This is not the case today.

roscoe · « **Reply #19 on:** June 20, 2009, 11:44:00 PM »

Quote from: Prodinoscopus

Quote from: roscoe
That is because he WAS a true Pope.

I think that the point here is that St. Catherine would never adopt the sedevacantist thesis. Feel free to interpret her writings otherwise if you wish, but I think that you will have to distort her intentions in order to do so.

I do not think you are qualified to say what St Catherine would or would not have done re: todays v2 anti-church. Be that as it may I AM NOT A 'SEDE VACANTIST' AND IN FACT HAD NEVER HEARD OF SUCH A THING until a visit to the TCW site.

The evidence is overwhelming that Greg XVII was truely elected Pope in 1958 and was such until 1989.

Author Topic: To all the &quot;sedes&quot; (Read 5688 times)

Author Topic: To all the "sedes" (Read 5688 times)