He withheld intention for Palmarians. He admitted that. We have the Angelus Magazine which refers to that.

I'm sorry that's not good enough for you. But it is for reasonable minded people.

You have to be ragebaiting. What authority does THE ANGELUS have in the subject?. Did the author know hear a rumor that no one else up to the publishing of that article has heard? Do you really believe that. Thuc’s prevailing fault was that he was perhaps too gullible. Dude, you are getting up there in gullibility if you believe an Angelus article that provides no citations for its claims. Anything you hear that is against Thuc, you immediately believe without any cross referencing. What if I just started calling you a pedophile on this forum? If people had your level of charity and ability to think for themselves, you would be throw in jail forever simply based off of my unsubstantiated claim. Gullible Tom can’t think for himself!

God will decide if those Williamson Consecrations were necessary or not. Just as God will decide whether the Pivarunas-Dolan Consecration was necessary.

Sir, the problem is that the Church with God's authority has already judged on the matter of episcopal consecrations without apostolic mandate, see Canon 953, Ad Apostolorum Principis by Pope Pius XII and many other authoritative texts. Not even the dire need for valid sacraments that we are facing right now can justify that because epikeia cannot be invoked against natural law, and the nature of the episcopacy is hierarchical. Consequently, traditionalist bishops who claim to have no authority are like "square circles", a theological impossibility. Fr. Hervé Belmont, independent priest from France, ordained by ABL, has extensively written about this problem. Here's his website: Accueil - Quicuмque - Abbé Hervé Belmont It's worth a read.