Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Thoughts on the FSSP, Indult?  (Read 27762 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 12006
  • Reputation: +7543/-2273
  • Gender: Male
Re: Thoughts on the FSSP, Indult?
« Reply #150 on: December 04, 2023, 04:52:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Meg, go read THE WHOLE thread and get back to us when you're caught up.

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6790
    • Reputation: +3467/-2999
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Thoughts on the FSSP, Indult?
    « Reply #151 on: December 04, 2023, 05:34:59 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • Meg, go read THE WHOLE thread and get back to us when you're caught up.

    So.....would that be a no....Fr. Hesse is not a valid priest? 

    It's not a difficult question, is it? You present yourself as an authority on everything relating to the Catholic Faith, so it shouldn't be a difficult question for you.
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29


    Offline Plenus Venter

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1509
    • Reputation: +1235/-97
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thoughts on the FSSP, Indult?
    « Reply #152 on: December 04, 2023, 05:44:18 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • So.....would that be a no....Fr. Hesse is not a valid priest?

    It's not a difficult question, is it? You present yourself as an authority on everything relating to the Catholic Faith, so it shouldn't be a difficult question for you.
    Meg, Archbishop Vigano was ordained priest in March of 1968, three months before the new rite of ordination was introduced. It is his episcopal consecration in 1982 at the hands of Pope JPII that is in doubt. Fr Hesse on the other hand was ordained in the new rite but by a validly consecrated bishop from the old rite.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46395
    • Reputation: +27305/-5043
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thoughts on the FSSP, Indult?
    « Reply #153 on: December 04, 2023, 06:37:05 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Meg, Archbishop Vigano was ordained priest in March of 1968, three months before the new rite of ordination was introduced. It is his episcopal consecration in 1982 at the hands of Pope JPII that is in doubt. Fr Hesse on the other hand was ordained in the new rite but by a validly consecrated bishop from the old rite.

    Right, and JP2 Wojtyla was validly consecrated in the Old Rite also, though that doesn't factor in here.  I knew a priest who was ordained by Wojtyla in the New Rite and then was conditionally ordained by Bishop Williamson.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46395
    • Reputation: +27305/-5043
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thoughts on the FSSP, Indult?
    « Reply #154 on: December 04, 2023, 06:39:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • So.....would that be a no....Fr. Hesse is not a valid priest?

    It's not a difficult question, is it? You present yourself as an authority on everything relating to the Catholic Faith, so it shouldn't be a difficult question for you.

    I would hold that Fr. Hesse is a doubtfully-ordained priest.


    Offline ElwinRansom1970

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 995
    • Reputation: +751/-143
    • Gender: Male
    • γνῶθι σεαυτόν - temet nosce
    Re: Thoughts on the FSSP, Indult?
    « Reply #155 on: December 04, 2023, 06:44:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Right, and JP2 Wojtyla was validly consecrated in the Old Rite also, though that doesn't factor in here.  I knew a priest who was ordained by Wojtyla in the New Rite and then was conditionally ordained by Bishop Williamson.
    And this priest has been a member of the FSSP for 3 decades now if he be the same priest of whom I believe you are referring.
    "I distrust every idea that does not seem obsolete and grotesque to my contemporaries."
    Nicolás Gómez Dávila

    Offline Plenus Venter

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1509
    • Reputation: +1235/-97
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thoughts on the FSSP, Indult?
    « Reply #156 on: December 04, 2023, 06:46:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Right, and JP2 Wojtyla was validly consecrated in the Old Rite also, though that doesn't factor in here.  I knew a priest who was ordained by Wojtyla in the New Rite and then was conditionally ordained by Bishop Williamson.
    I think I'd want to be ordained again if that were me too! I think there is enough positive doubt from all that JPII did that he could have an intention contrary to that of the Church... I'm not sure how theological that is, but I think I recall Bishop Williamson saying something to the effect that the concerns of the faithful may be enough to justify conditionally repeating the ordination.

    Offline Plenus Venter

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1509
    • Reputation: +1235/-97
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thoughts on the FSSP, Indult?
    « Reply #157 on: December 04, 2023, 06:50:22 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I would hold that Fr. Hesse is a doubtfully-ordained priest.
    With due respect to Ladislaus, I would hold that Archbishop Lefebvre, Bishop Williamson, Bishop Tissier and Fr Schmidberger of old (I just can't bring myself to say Bp F...) can be taken as sure guides given to us by the Good Lord in this crisis who would not have put the salvation of souls in danger in such a certain manner, especially ABL, the prelate given a special mission from God for leading the flock in this crisis.


    Offline ElwinRansom1970

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 995
    • Reputation: +751/-143
    • Gender: Male
    • γνῶθι σεαυτόν - temet nosce
    Re: Thoughts on the FSSP, Indult?
    « Reply #158 on: December 04, 2023, 06:57:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • With due respect to Ladislaus, I would hold that Archbishop Lefebvre, Bishop Williamson, Bishop Tissier and Fr Schmidberger of old (I just can't bring myself to say Bp F...) can be taken as sure guides given to us by the Good Lord in this crisis who would not have put the salvation of souls in danger in such a certain manner, especially ABL, the prelate given a special mission from God for leading the flock in this crisis.
    What you hold is pious wishes regarding these prelates and priest but not in any way binding truth on any Catholic. One could argue the same about Fr. Leonard Feeney and Sister Catherine Goddard Clarke, Archbishop Thuc and Bishop des Lauriers, or Father Cekada and Bishop Sanborn and such argument would be of the same value.
    "I distrust every idea that does not seem obsolete and grotesque to my contemporaries."
    Nicolás Gómez Dávila

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12006
    • Reputation: +7543/-2273
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thoughts on the FSSP, Indult?
    « Reply #159 on: December 04, 2023, 07:23:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote
    With due respect to Ladislaus, I would hold that 
    The difference is that Ladislaus’ opinion is based on facts, while yours is based on emotion.  

    Offline Steve

    • Supporter
    • *
    • Posts: 101
    • Reputation: +54/-3
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thoughts on the FSSP, Indult?
    « Reply #160 on: December 04, 2023, 07:38:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You need to get ahold of yourself. You are very confused and need to do some calm prayer and research.

    Archbishop Lefebvre and his line of bishops/priests is 100% valid with no danger or doubt. That whole "Lienart was a Freemason" was a stupid argument when they trotted it out the 1st time, as well as the 1000th time. It's a false argument made up by sedevacantists and other enemies, with the aim of eliminating the competition. The SSPX was a huge organization, very Catholic, and blessed by God for decades, one of the primary bulwarks of Tradition (the Traditional Movement). Look at the fruits. A good tree can only bear good fruit.

    There were co-consecrators at +ABL's consecration. And by going through the ceremony, the consecrator intends to "do what the Church does". You see, the problem with the Novus Ordo Mass is that the liturgy ITSELF is ambiguous, suggesting it's just a meal and/or the People are the ones who consecrate/offer the Sacrifice, so if the priest doesn't explicitly know and intend to consecrate the bread and wine into the Body and Blood of Jesus -- due to his seminary training -- then one can reasonably worry that it didn't happen. That's what's great about the Traditional Mass -- the ceremony itself is un-ambiguous.

    As for why that providential, God-blessed SSPX "fell" -- I'll give you the same reason I'd give for how the Catholic Church  (a.k.a. Bride of Christ, the Church founded by God Himself) could have "problems" starting in the 1960's. God allows these crises in order to test the Faithful, to bring good out of evil, and allow his Elect to practice virtue. If the Bride of Christ could go into this kind of Crisis, you better believe the SSPX is fair game!

    There is some doubt about the new Rite of Ordination and Consecration. No, there were not any such doubts before Vatican II. Nothing substantial was done to the Ordination Rite, just like nothing was done to the Faith or the Mass which affected its fundamental dogmas or premises. You need to read some books on the Crisis, what happened at Vatican II, what they systematically changed. That will enlighten you immensely.

    Don't give up the Faith. The devil is playing with your mind right now. Go read some *books* on the Crisis in the Church that started at Vatican II. Angelus Press had several good books on the topic, and they still do.
    Agree:  find and read books on VII.  There's no substitute for your own research.  But it is all out there.  You don't have to be a theologian, you can be a layman with limited time, but get 1 or 2 good ones at least and s-t-u-d-y them.  To paraphrase Bp Williamson, 'Thinking hurts, but, my dear, God wants you to think and you'd better think if you want to save your soul.'  


    Offline Plenus Venter

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1509
    • Reputation: +1235/-97
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thoughts on the FSSP, Indult?
    « Reply #161 on: December 04, 2023, 07:44:33 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • The difference is that Ladislaus’ opinion is based on facts, while yours is based on emotion. 
    Ha ha! Classic Pax. Yours is based on delusion! Does it not occur to you that Archbishop Lefebvre, the prelate prepared by Almighty God from all eternity for this special mission in His Church - just pause for a moment and consider what that means - might have a better understanding of the FACTS of sacramental theology than Ladisalaus or you? That is fact, not emotion. The Good Lord does not expect every member of the faithful to be a theologian. There is no reason to doubt the Archbishop's judgement, and I strongly recommend you read Fr Calderon's study on the NREC, which hopefully will be posted soon, to educate yourself better on this subject.

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12006
    • Reputation: +7543/-2273
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thoughts on the FSSP, Indult?
    « Reply #162 on: December 04, 2023, 09:38:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote
    There is no reason to doubt the Archbishop's judgement, and I strongly recommend you read Fr Calderon's study on the NREC, which hopefully will be posted soon, to educate yourself better on this subject.
    So your argument is that all other Trad clerics are wrong and there is 0% doubt with the new rites?

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14659
    • Reputation: +6043/-904
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thoughts on the FSSP, Indult?
    « Reply #163 on: December 05, 2023, 05:11:48 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Many, many Trad clerics disagree.  Fr Hesse isn't (or didn't start off as) a Trad priest.  He's obviously going to shill for V2.  It's appalling that you can't see the bias here.
    He had more reason than anyone to get to the truth of the matter, to prove himself valid or invalid. You make him out to be a type of enemy or infiltrator. A shill for V2? Now you're really reaching. Listen to the video before you make any more such absurd comments.

    No, this is contrary to canon law.

    Once you change a sacrament, it's no longer from the Church. 

    A.  Major - The Church presumes validity for sacraments which are a) approved, b) by Apostolic Authority, c) under pain of sin, d) for the entire Church. 
    B.  Minor - V2 sacraments do not fulfill the conditions for either a, b, c or d.
    C.  Minor 2 - The only sacraments which are true are the rites coming from Pope St Pius V and Quo Primum.  These fulfill all conditions for a, b, c, d.
    D.  Minor 3 - The Church only has 1 rite in the Latin Church.  She cannot and does not have 2 rites at the same time.
    E.  Conclusion - The Church does not presume validity for sacraments She didn't approve; V2 sacraments are not true sacraments, but in name-only.
    You are so far off base on this I will just leave it at that. :fryingpan:
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4750
    • Reputation: +2896/-667
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thoughts on the FSSP, Indult?
    « Reply #164 on: December 05, 2023, 05:24:56 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Ha ha! Classic Pax. Yours is based on delusion! Does it not occur to you that Archbishop Lefebvre, the prelate prepared by Almighty God from all eternity for this special mission in His Church - just pause for a moment and consider what that means - might have a better understanding of the FACTS of sacramental theology than Ladisalaus or you? That is fact, not emotion. The Good Lord does not expect every member of the faithful to be a theologian. There is no reason to doubt the Archbishop's judgement, and I strongly recommend you read Fr Calderon's study on the NREC, which hopefully will be posted soon, to educate yourself better on this subject.

    Sadly, you write as though the Archbishop was infallible. :facepalm:
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?