Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Thoughts on the divisions among the nine  (Read 29231 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Ambrose

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3447
  • Reputation: +2429/-13
  • Gender: Male
Thoughts on the divisions among the nine
« Reply #120 on: June 03, 2014, 08:53:22 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SenzaDubbio
    Quote from: Lover of Truth
    SSG sent back $100 because they insisted on $20 a Mass rather than $10 and would not give it to the Mexican clergy who could really use it as they would have had I initially only asked for 5 Masses for $100 instead of 10.  When I said, okay how about only 5 Masses they still sent the money back.


    Maybe they felt you didn't have the proper disposition, or it was a mistake God allowed even after your request for 5 rather than 10? Requesting a Mass is of infinite value. I heard in a sermon, I believe from Fr. Benedict Hughes C.M.R.I., that it is customary for the stipend to be 1/3 of a day's pay. Of course God knows how much it is a sacrifice for you, and sometimes it's not possible.

    What does IMO stand for?


    Last I checked, the customery offering for a mass stipend for CMRI priests was $20.
    The Council of Trent, The Catechism of the Council of Trent, Papal Teaching, The Teaching of the Holy Office, The Teaching of the Church Fathers, The Code of Canon Law, Countless approved catechisms, The Doctors of the Church, The teaching of the Dogmatic

    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1932/-17
    • Gender: Male
    Thoughts on the divisions among the nine
    « Reply #121 on: June 03, 2014, 09:32:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: 2Vermont
    Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: 2Vermont
    You assert that Fr Cekada is not successful.  Am I a product of his failures given his writings and words had a huge influence in my choosing to accept the SV position?


    Why do you think this is about you? And I'm certain the Dimonds to have influenced some to return to Tradition.


    Just some more avoidance.

    And now you're equating Fr Cekada with the Dimond Brothers.


    No, I was equating what you claimed with similar examples of people who discovered tradition by reading the Dimonds material.
    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil


    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1932/-17
    • Gender: Male
    Thoughts on the divisions among the nine
    « Reply #122 on: June 03, 2014, 09:39:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: Ambrose
    Footnote 71 used to support Fr. Cekada's assertion ...


    I'm not sure this is an actual decision made by the Holy Office.


    He cited his source.  It comes from a respected pre-Conciliar canonist.  It appears to me to be a quote from the Holy Office or a description of the decision from Fr. Regatillo.

    Fr. Regatillo is either quoting from the decision, or is attesting to the fact of the decision of the Holy Office.  Are you arguing that he misrepresented or failed to understand the decision of the Holy Office?  If so, what evidence are you relying on?


    The fact is that it isn't an actual decision of the Holy Office, and Cekada represents it as "a final nail in the coffin," which if it was, would be all that is needed. In other words, I'm saying Cekada plays fast and loose with the facts, including the relating of the entire question to a single priest from a "backwater diocese," when it appears to be a letter written to Fr. Dolan, and signed by nine priests with whom he had relatively close ties.
    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil

    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1932/-17
    • Gender: Male
    Thoughts on the divisions among the nine
    « Reply #123 on: June 03, 2014, 09:43:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: SenzaDubbio
    Quote from: Lover of Truth
    SSG sent back $100 because they insisted on $20 a Mass rather than $10 and would not give it to the Mexican clergy who could really use it as they would have had I initially only asked for 5 Masses for $100 instead of 10.  When I said, okay how about only 5 Masses they still sent the money back.


    Maybe they felt you didn't have the proper disposition, or it was a mistake God allowed even after your request for 5 rather than 10? Requesting a Mass is of infinite value. I heard in a sermon, I believe from Fr. Benedict Hughes C.M.R.I., that it is customary for the stipend to be 1/3 of a day's pay. Of course God knows how much it is a sacrifice for you, and sometimes it's not possible.

    What does IMO stand for?


    Last I checked, the customery offering for a mass stipend for CMRI priests was $20.


    Again the point taken here, at least by me, it that Fr. Cekada cannot accept anybody questioning him. Instead of making an agreeable arrangement, he sent the relatively small amount back and destroyed the relationship.
    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil

    Offline Ambrose

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3447
    • Reputation: +2429/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Thoughts on the divisions among the nine
    « Reply #124 on: June 03, 2014, 10:00:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: SenzaDubbio
    Quote from: Lover of Truth
    SSG sent back $100 because they insisted on $20 a Mass rather than $10 and would not give it to the Mexican clergy who could really use it as they would have had I initially only asked for 5 Masses for $100 instead of 10.  When I said, okay how about only 5 Masses they still sent the money back.


    Maybe they felt you didn't have the proper disposition, or it was a mistake God allowed even after your request for 5 rather than 10? Requesting a Mass is of infinite value. I heard in a sermon, I believe from Fr. Benedict Hughes C.M.R.I., that it is customary for the stipend to be 1/3 of a day's pay. Of course God knows how much it is a sacrifice for you, and sometimes it's not possible.

    What does IMO stand for?


    Last I checked, the customery offering for a mass stipend for CMRI priests was $20.


    Again the point taken here, at least by me, it that Fr. Cekada cannot accept anybody questioning him. Instead of making an agreeable arrangement, he sent the relatively small amount back and destroyed the relationship.


    I think if you go to Mass with CMRI, it will be a breath of fresh air for you.  They will treat you with kindness and respect, and you will not encounter the problems you dealt with in your involvement with these other priests.

    The CMRI builds relationships with Catholics who attend their chapels based on mutual respect and trust.  
    The Council of Trent, The Catechism of the Council of Trent, Papal Teaching, The Teaching of the Holy Office, The Teaching of the Church Fathers, The Code of Canon Law, Countless approved catechisms, The Doctors of the Church, The teaching of the Dogmatic


    Offline Ambrose

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3447
    • Reputation: +2429/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Thoughts on the divisions among the nine
    « Reply #125 on: June 04, 2014, 12:28:52 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Hermenegild
    Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: Hermenegild
    Isn't the CMRI in communion with the SSPX?


    Yes.

    Catholics are required by divine law to remain in communion with other Catholics.  To do otherwise is to fall into schism.


    That doesn't make sense. The SSPX are in communion with Francis and the other heretics of the modernist hierarchy.

    That would put the CMRI in communion with Francis and the other heretics of the modernist hierarchy as well.


    To remain in communion with an undeclared heretic, if one is unsure of his status, is not a schismatic act.  

    The voice of authority has not yet spoken, the matter remains authoritatively unresolved.  

    A question for you:  which undeclared heretic was the entire Catholic world in communion with in 1966?
    The Council of Trent, The Catechism of the Council of Trent, Papal Teaching, The Teaching of the Holy Office, The Teaching of the Church Fathers, The Code of Canon Law, Countless approved catechisms, The Doctors of the Church, The teaching of the Dogmatic

    Offline SerpKerp

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 70
    • Reputation: +31/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Thoughts on the divisions among the nine
    « Reply #126 on: June 04, 2014, 01:16:59 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Elizabeth
    Quote from: SerpKerp
    Elizabeth, Im sorry for doubting you is there anything else you can tell me?
    Please tell me what ever.


    No apologies needed, Serp.  It is right to be wary of what we see online, and a great good to love our priests. Anyway, trying to explain or describe the sspv is still very difficult for me.  We really loved them and trusted them.  It was mind bending to try to sort out what was happening, and why so many truly beautiful souls were so into that culture.  

    Nepotism was/is a main ingredient.  Now, if your priest isn't employing and showing extreme favoritism for his own family members, who own the property and work there, maybe your chapel is not so toxic.  If your priest handles the inevitable problems which occur within communities with a Catholic sense, there is hope.  

    I think LoverofTruth was pretty balanced with his advice to you.  



    I did notice what looked like some Nepotism going on.

    Offline Ambrose

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3447
    • Reputation: +2429/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Thoughts on the divisions among the nine
    « Reply #127 on: June 04, 2014, 02:25:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Hermenegild
    Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: Hermenegild
    Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: Hermenegild
    Isn't the CMRI in communion with the SSPX?


    Yes.

    Catholics are required by divine law to remain in communion with other Catholics.  To do otherwise is to fall into schism.


    That doesn't make sense. The SSPX are in communion with Francis and the other heretics of the modernist hierarchy.

    That would put the CMRI in communion with Francis and the other heretics of the modernist hierarchy as well.


    To remain in communion with an undeclared heretic, if one is unsure of his status, is not a schismatic act.  

    The voice of authority has not yet spoken, the matter remains authoritatively unresolved.  

    A question for you:  which undeclared heretic was the entire Catholic world in communion with in 1966?


    In 1966 most Catholics were certain of the popes status. If fact, the SSPX is also certain of the pope's status today.ed

    That doesn't change the fact that the CMRI are in communion with the SSPX and the SSPX are in communion with Francis and the other heretics of the modernist hierarchy. Therefore, the CMRI are in communion with Francis and the other heretics of the modernist hierarchy.

    The Church is one body and one faith.



    In 1966 the entire Catholic world professed that Paul VI, an undeclared heretic was Pope.

    In 2014, many Catholics profess that Francis, an undeclared heretic is Pope.

    The principle remains the same.  Catholics that erroneously adhere to a heretical antipope, but do not follow him into heresy, do not sever themselves from the Church.  
    The Council of Trent, The Catechism of the Council of Trent, Papal Teaching, The Teaching of the Holy Office, The Teaching of the Church Fathers, The Code of Canon Law, Countless approved catechisms, The Doctors of the Church, The teaching of the Dogmatic


    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11384
    • Reputation: +6354/-1115
    • Gender: Female
    Thoughts on the divisions among the nine
    « Reply #128 on: June 04, 2014, 04:11:41 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Now I'm confused.  CMRI is connected with SSPX?  I thought they were sedevacantist.

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11384
    • Reputation: +6354/-1115
    • Gender: Female
    Thoughts on the divisions among the nine
    « Reply #129 on: June 04, 2014, 04:24:26 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: Ambrose
    Footnote 71 used to support Fr. Cekada's assertion ...


    I'm not sure this is an actual decision made by the Holy Office.


    He cited his source.  It comes from a respected pre-Conciliar canonist.  It appears to me to be a quote from the Holy Office or a description of the decision from Fr. Regatillo.

    Fr. Regatillo is either quoting from the decision, or is attesting to the fact of the decision of the Holy Office.  Are you arguing that he misrepresented or failed to understand the decision of the Holy Office?  If so, what evidence are you relying on?


    The fact is that it isn't an actual decision of the Holy Office, and Cekada represents it as "a final nail in the coffin," which if it was, would be all that is needed. In other words, I'm saying Cekada plays fast and loose with the facts, including the relating of the entire question to a single priest from a "backwater diocese," when it appears to be a letter written to Fr. Dolan, and signed by nine priests with whom he had relatively close ties.


    Do you have proof that it isn't an actual decision of the Holy Office?

    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1159/-864
    • Gender: Male
    Thoughts on the divisions among the nine
    « Reply #130 on: June 04, 2014, 05:08:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: SenzaDubbio
    Quote from: Lover of Truth
    SSG sent back $100 because they insisted on $20 a Mass rather than $10 and would not give it to the Mexican clergy who could really use it as they would have had I initially only asked for 5 Masses for $100 instead of 10.  When I said, okay how about only 5 Masses they still sent the money back.


    Maybe they felt you didn't have the proper disposition, or it was a mistake God allowed even after your request for 5 rather than 10? Requesting a Mass is of infinite value. I heard in a sermon, I believe from Fr. Benedict Hughes C.M.R.I., that it is customary for the stipend to be 1/3 of a day's pay. Of course God knows how much it is a sacrifice for you, and sometimes it's not possible.

    What does IMO stand for?


    Last I checked, the customery offering for a mass stipend for CMRI priests was $20.


    This was some time ago, but why would you send money back, depriving the Priests in Mexico of it, and refuse to just offer the five Masses.  Obviously they can't make a cost for any blessing mandatory right?  Why would the bishop avoid responding to me.  I would have sent them money yearly had they been Catholic about the situation.  At least until I found out about the other nonsense that goes on there.  They ignore problems and issues with the laity there plain and simple.  Also, I'm not sure you realized but anyone who disagrees with them is "insane".  So you can take that for what it is worth.  These clergy have a huge responsibility on their shoulders and those they scandalize away from the faith will be something they will have to answer for along with the vocations they have scarred away due to the craziness that goes on in their school.
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church


    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1159/-864
    • Gender: Male
    Thoughts on the divisions among the nine
    « Reply #131 on: June 04, 2014, 05:14:20 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SenzaDubbio
    Quote from: Lover of Truth
    SSG sent back $100 because they insisted on $20 a Mass rather than $10 and would not give it to the Mexican clergy who could really use it as they would have had I initially only asked for 5 Masses for $100 instead of 10.  When I said, okay how about only 5 Masses they still sent the money back.


    Maybe they felt you didn't have the proper disposition, or it was a mistake God allowed even after your request for 5 rather than 10? Requesting a Mass is of infinite value. I heard in a sermon, I believe from Fr. Benedict Hughes C.M.R.I., that it is customary for the stipend to be 1/3 of a day's pay. Of course God knows how much it is a sacrifice for you, and sometimes it's not possible.

    What does IMO stand for?


    IMO is In My Opinion.  Some can't afford anything.  Some can afford more.  But I don't believe they can insist on a certain amount but only suggest it.  Simony falls in there somewhere I think.  A revolt was started over the issue a few centuries ago.  
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church

    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1159/-864
    • Gender: Male
    Thoughts on the divisions among the nine
    « Reply #132 on: June 04, 2014, 05:17:04 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: SenzaDubbio
    Quote from: Lover of Truth
    SSG sent back $100 because they insisted on $20 a Mass rather than $10 and would not give it to the Mexican clergy who could really use it as they would have had I initially only asked for 5 Masses for $100 instead of 10.  When I said, okay how about only 5 Masses they still sent the money back.


    Maybe they felt you didn't have the proper disposition, or it was a mistake God allowed even after your request for 5 rather than 10? Requesting a Mass is of infinite value. I heard in a sermon, I believe from Fr. Benedict Hughes C.M.R.I., that it is customary for the stipend to be 1/3 of a day's pay. Of course God knows how much it is a sacrifice for you, and sometimes it's not possible.

    What does IMO stand for?


    Last I checked, the customery offering for a mass stipend for CMRI priests was $20.


    Again the point taken here, at least by me, it that Fr. Cekada cannot accept anybody questioning him. Instead of making an agreeable arrangement, he sent the relatively small amount back and destroyed the relationship.


    Correct.  Thank you.  Though frankly $100 wasn't small in my estimation.  For them I'm sure it is nothing.  
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church

    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1159/-864
    • Gender: Male
    Thoughts on the divisions among the nine
    « Reply #133 on: June 04, 2014, 05:19:00 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: SenzaDubbio
    Quote from: Lover of Truth
    SSG sent back $100 because they insisted on $20 a Mass rather than $10 and would not give it to the Mexican clergy who could really use it as they would have had I initially only asked for 5 Masses for $100 instead of 10.  When I said, okay how about only 5 Masses they still sent the money back.


    Maybe they felt you didn't have the proper disposition, or it was a mistake God allowed even after your request for 5 rather than 10? Requesting a Mass is of infinite value. I heard in a sermon, I believe from Fr. Benedict Hughes C.M.R.I., that it is customary for the stipend to be 1/3 of a day's pay. Of course God knows how much it is a sacrifice for you, and sometimes it's not possible.

    What does IMO stand for?


    Last I checked, the customery offering for a mass stipend for CMRI priests was $20.


    Again the point taken here, at least by me, it that Fr. Cekada cannot accept anybody questioning him. Instead of making an agreeable arrangement, he sent the relatively small amount back and destroyed the relationship.


    I think if you go to Mass with CMRI, it will be a breath of fresh air for you.  They will treat you with kindness and respect, and you will not encounter the problems you dealt with in your involvement with these other priests.

    The CMRI builds relationships with Catholics who attend their chapels based on mutual respect and trust.  


    The CRMI is the best in regards to how they treat the laity.  They have a Catholic attitude.  They are the best, apart from perhaps some independent Priests.  They beat SSPV and SGG by a long shot in regards to having a Catholic attitude towards the laity.
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church

    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1159/-864
    • Gender: Male
    Thoughts on the divisions among the nine
    « Reply #134 on: June 04, 2014, 05:21:16 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Hermenegild
    Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: Hermenegild
    Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: Hermenegild
    Isn't the CMRI in communion with the SSPX?


    Yes.

    Catholics are required by divine law to remain in communion with other Catholics.  To do otherwise is to fall into schism.


    That doesn't make sense. The SSPX are in communion with Francis and the other heretics of the modernist hierarchy.

    That would put the CMRI in communion with Francis and the other heretics of the modernist hierarchy as well.


    To remain in communion with an undeclared heretic, if one is unsure of his status, is not a schismatic act.  

    The voice of authority has not yet spoken, the matter remains authoritatively unresolved.  

    A question for you:  which undeclared heretic was the entire Catholic world in communion with in 1966?


    In 1966 most Catholics were certain of the popes status. If fact, the SSPX is also certain of the pope's status today.

    That doesn't change the fact that the CMRI are in communion with the SSPX and the SSPX are in communion with Francis and the other heretics of the modernist hierarchy. Therefore, the CMRI are in communion with Francis and the other heretics of the modernist hierarchy.

    The Church is one body and one faith.



    What do you mean when you say "in communion with".  Ambrose is giving you the technically sound response but you both might be talking about two different things.  CMRI is not affiliated with SSPX and is not in union with Francis.
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church