Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Thoughts on Rome possibly rescinding faculties?  (Read 244 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Thoughts on Rome possibly rescinding faculties?
« on: Yesterday at 07:22:23 PM »
I was thinking that in light of Menzingen's stance today about the consecrations for July, wouldn't Rome be smart to rescind the faculties that were granted to the SSPX by Francis as a pressure move?

Think about it. Many have been going to the Society chapels thinking that it was "legal" since the "year of Mercy" in 2013. Such a move by Rome would destabilize to some degree the financial position of the Society and give Rome some intel about who would stick with them in the coming months(?).If I were Rome, I would definitely make this move.

Thoughts?

Re: Thoughts on Rome possibly rescinding faculties?
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 08:22:06 PM »
If their disagreements are true, it would make sense, but they most likely are not. It's all part of a bigger plan. Behind closed doors they are all drinking expensive French wine together.


Offline Twice dyed

  • Supporter
Re: Thoughts on Rome possibly rescinding faculties?
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 08:52:16 PM »
  I don't expect the Vatican do make any move before July 1, 2026. Today, doesn't the neoSSPX have the long end of the stick?...meaning their position is better based on the Catholic doctrine than Rome's, and if one asks Rome to explain why the SSPX will be / should be excommunicated, Rome will fail to tell the world anything convincing. Case in point: the LGβ+ types are welcomed with open arms, divorcees are receiving communion, K0mmunist China is Pope approved for choosing their bishops, Pagans are included, Schismatics and others. Let's just summarize it by saying the deck is stacked against Rome; whereas the SSPX is the poster boy for the Latin Mass mov't. Remember Pope Francis wondering how the SSPX could have so much money to build in St. Marys, Kansas?. Their Seminary was a huge monetary decision too!  Mexico also built a fabulous church, Northern France etc .
So, lots of dough going to the SSPX from the zealous,  maybe the Vatican is jealou$??

Pope Leo XIV has a calm disposition.




****************
http://www.fiuv.org/2026/02/fiuv-statement-on-planned-sspx.html
Statement here from Una Voce, Excerpt:

"...We share the SSPX’s goal, that the Church’s ancient liturgy be made available as widely as possible for the good of souls. We do not share the SSPX’s analysis of the crisis of the Church in all its details. In particular we know many Catholics able to attend the Traditional Mass with all the necessary permissions from the Church’s hierarchy, such that it is not necessary for them to seek it in any irregular context.

We also know, however, that for others, attending the Traditional Mass has been made very difficult: in some places, this is despite the desire of qualified priests to celebrate it for the faithful, and even the willingness of the local bishop to allow this. This creates an environment in which the SSPX argument of a ‘state of emergency’ gains sympathy.

We urge our bishops, and above all His Holiness Pope Leo XIV, to be mindful of these pastoral realities, which are at this moment precipitating a crisis whose consequences no one can foresee.

What Catholics attached to the ‘former Missal’ desire is not some harmful or novel liturgical form. Pope St John Paul II called our desire for this Missal a ‘rightful aspiration’ (Ecclesia Dei, 1988), and later Pope Benedict XVI described it as a source of ‘riches’ (Letter to Bishops, 2007).

The time to act is now.


Joseph Shaw
President, Una Voce International, and Chairman, Latin Mass Society





Re: Thoughts on Rome possibly rescinding faculties?
« Reply #3 on: Today at 05:49:59 AM »
The fact that they have faculties at all shows why they should be avoided.

Resistance Bishop Williamson got "excommunicated". The mark that the resistance is the remnant.

Re: Thoughts on Rome possibly rescinding faculties?
« Reply #4 on: Today at 06:41:13 PM »
The fact that they have faculties at all shows why they should be avoided.

Resistance Bishop Williamson got "excommunicated". The mark that the resistance is the remnant.
I don't think his lordship would agree with you, he has and would say this line of thinking is radical."get over your toys, I will NOT  lead.  It is a radical movement."

Despite what you or I believe about the false "excommunications", BW accepted them and he gave a sincere personal thank you to Benedict XVI:

“Your Eminence…Please also accept, and convey to the Holy Father, my sincere personal thanks for the docuмent signed last Wednesday and made public on Saturday. Most humbly I will offer a Mass for both of you. Sincerely yours in Christ.” (+Richard Williamson, January 28, 2009) rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2009/01/apology-letter-of-bishop-richard.html

So you need to be careful how confident you are with your current narrative when approaching those, who may be sincere and ignorant are inside the Conciliar Church, that need some clarity and patience.