Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4

Author Topic: This subforum needs a name charge.  (Read 4021 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lighthouse

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 872
  • Reputation: +580/-27
  • Gender: Male
This subforum needs a name charge.
« on: March 14, 2014, 09:30:11 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • ABODATT.


    All BOD, all the time
    Logged

    Offline crossbro

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1434
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    This subforum needs a name charge.
    « Reply #1 on: March 14, 2014, 09:56:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

    • Troublemaker  :boxer:
    Logged

    Offline JohnAnthonyMarie

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1297
    • Reputation: +603/-63
    • Gender: Male
      • TraditionalCatholic.net
    This subforum needs a name charge.
    « Reply #2 on: March 14, 2014, 10:11:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • SBC Annex
    Logged
    Omnes pro Christo

    Offline Ambrose

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3447
    • Reputation: +2429/-13
    • Gender: Male
    This subforum needs a name charge.
    « Reply #3 on: March 14, 2014, 10:42:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: JohnAnthonyMarie
    SBC Annex


    These guys are more radical than the SBC, I smell Dimond stench.
    Logged
    The Council of Trent, The Catechism of the Council of Trent, Papal Teaching, The Teaching of the Holy Office, The Teaching of the Church Fathers, The Code of Canon Law, Countless approved catechisms, The Doctors of the Church, The teaching of the Dogmatic

    Offline Mabel

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1893
    • Reputation: +1386/-25
    • Gender: Female
    This subforum needs a name charge.
    « Reply #4 on: March 15, 2014, 01:18:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: JohnAnthonyMarie
    SBC Annex


    These guys are more radical than the SBC, I smell Dimond stench.


    It isn't just limited to this sub forum, the Dimondbots are everywhere on CI. It is making what is normally edifying, interesting, or informative the opposite.
    Logged

    Offline Charlemagne

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1439
    • Reputation: +2103/-18
    • Gender: Male
    This subforum needs a name charge.
    « Reply #5 on: March 15, 2014, 01:20:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: JohnAnthonyMarie
    SBC Annex


    These guys are more radical than the SBC, I smell Dimond stench.


    "This is anti-Christ!"
    Logged
    "This principle is most certain: The non-Christian cannot in any way be Pope. The reason for this is that he cannot be head of what he is not a member. Now, he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian, St. Athanasius, St. Augustine, St. Jerome, and others. Therefore, the manifest heretic cannot be Pope." -- St. Robert Bellarmine

    Offline Ambrose

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3447
    • Reputation: +2429/-13
    • Gender: Male
    This subforum needs a name charge.
    « Reply #6 on: March 15, 2014, 01:38:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Mabel
    Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: JohnAnthonyMarie
    SBC Annex


    These guys are more radical than the SBC, I smell Dimond stench.


    It isn't just limited to this sub forum, the Dimondbots are everywhere on CI. It is making what is normally edifying, interesting, or informative the opposite.


    A Catholic forum should be for Catholics and for those seeking to learn Catholicism, or at the very least for those who are not yet believers but open to learning.

    When a forum allows open heresy and grave errors against the Faith such as Dimondism, Feeneyism, Lutheranism or any other Protestant group, it only hurts the forum.

    Logged
    The Council of Trent, The Catechism of the Council of Trent, Papal Teaching, The Teaching of the Holy Office, The Teaching of the Church Fathers, The Code of Canon Law, Countless approved catechisms, The Doctors of the Church, The teaching of the Dogmatic

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10056
    • Reputation: +5252/-916
    • Gender: Female
    This subforum needs a name charge.
    « Reply #7 on: March 15, 2014, 02:09:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Lighthouse
    ABODATT.


    All BOD, all the time


    Oh you are just of BAD WILL!!!!
    Logged
    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. (Matthew 24:24)

    Offline Capt McQuigg

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4671
    • Reputation: +2624/-10
    • Gender: Male
    This subforum needs a name charge.
    « Reply #8 on: March 15, 2014, 02:23:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • BOD is an important topic for discussion because there is so much danger involved.  Hashing out must take place.

    Logged

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41864
    • Reputation: +23919/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    This subforum needs a name charge.
    « Reply #9 on: March 15, 2014, 02:25:43 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Only the bad-willed do not wish to discuss this issue.
    Logged

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41864
    • Reputation: +23919/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    This subforum needs a name charge.
    « Reply #10 on: March 15, 2014, 02:30:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: JohnAnthonyMarie
    SBC Annex


    These guys are more radical than the SBC, I smell Dimond stench.


    And I smell the stench of heresy.
    Logged

    Offline soulguard

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1698
    • Reputation: +4/-10
    • Gender: Male
    This subforum needs a name charge.
    « Reply #11 on: March 15, 2014, 02:33:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Not knowing what to think about BOD and BOB, I am saved by my ignorance and dont have an extra sin laid to my charge. If you have knowledge that one or the other is right you are at a disadvantage, just incase you are wrong - because CAN NOT UNSEE.!!
     :alcohol:
    Logged

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41864
    • Reputation: +23919/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    This subforum needs a name charge.
    « Reply #12 on: March 15, 2014, 02:40:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • I would guess there almost needs to be a dedicated BoD subforum as well as another one dedicated to Sedevacantism vs. Sedeplenism and a third dedicated to NFP.
    Logged

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4577/-579
    • Gender: Female
    This subforum needs a name charge.
    « Reply #13 on: March 15, 2014, 02:44:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Whereas I may agree with the unnecessity of multiple threads on a same topic and the harsh delivery of content, I completely disagree with the derrogative terms that some Catholics use upon the defendors of strict EENL, as it was taught for centuries before the modernist heresy took place back in 19th century.

    Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus is to be taken as written.  

    Terms such as "feneyism", "Dimondism" and the such only shows ignorance of real Catholic doctrine before modern times. It also shows how American Catholicism has been watered down to fit with current times and the liberal politics of this country. Authentic Catholicism is uncompatible with American ideals of freedom, justice, and equality and Catholics have been brainwashed so they can peacefully co-exist with the non-Catholics in a multi-racial, multi religion, multi-cultural nation. Some times it seems that Trads are just sadly stuck in the 50's. A careful study of Church history and the application of EENS before Modernism, is certainly much needed.
    Logged
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.

    Offline soulguard

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1698
    • Reputation: +4/-10
    • Gender: Male
    This subforum needs a name charge.
    « Reply #14 on: March 15, 2014, 02:58:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Ladislaus
    I would guess there almost needs to be a dedicated BoD subforum as well as another one dedicated to Sedevacantism vs. Sedeplenism and a third dedicated to NFP.


    Good idea Ladislaus, it would be good to have the forums split into sections where one easliy gets info on topics like BOD or Sedevacatnistn.
    Logged
    Pages: [1] 2 3 4
    « previous next »