Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: the vortex  (Read 4060 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline IllyricumSacrum

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 172
  • Reputation: +86/-2
  • Gender: Male
the vortex
« Reply #15 on: February 16, 2015, 01:41:55 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Padre Pio's last mass appears to be  a mostly Latin '65Ordo mass, versus populom, shortened prayers at the foot of the (high) altar, part or the Liturgy of the Catechumens done from the sedilla, readings done facing the congregation and in the vernacular, no Last Gospel, and so onL


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41908
    • Reputation: +23946/-4345
    • Gender: Male
    the vortex
    « Reply #16 on: February 16, 2015, 08:31:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Stubborn
    Terry Carroll is the Executive Producer for ChurchMilitant.TV

    Quote from: Terry Carrol
    Please take seriously my comment left on the other post: It is conceivable that SSPX Masses are as offensive to God as Black Masses. God is not mocked, and God does not bless disobedience. Stay with the Church and, in the best traditional sense, "offer it up" as an act of redemptive suffering within the divine chastisement that we all so painfully experience.


    I have never read a more repugnant thing from a Conciliar neocon than this; he's a perverted blasphemer.  Not to mention that he contradicts the Sacrosanct Vatican II, which states that Masses offered by the "separated brethren" please God and engender a life of grace.

    One might be able to argue that these Masses displease God, but to put them on the level of Black Masses is a blasphemy that could only have come from the devil himself.  Terry Carroll is a servant of Satan.  Plus, the Dimonds have pointed out that the Vortex "swirl" has a history in witchcraft.



    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41908
    • Reputation: +23946/-4345
    • Gender: Male
    the vortex
    « Reply #17 on: February 16, 2015, 08:40:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Well worth the watch:



    Offline Charlemagne

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1439
    • Reputation: +2103/-18
    • Gender: Male
    the vortex
    « Reply #18 on: February 16, 2015, 11:25:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I've said it before and I'll say it here again: Just remember that a flushing toilet is also a vortex.
    "This principle is most certain: The non-Christian cannot in any way be Pope. The reason for this is that he cannot be head of what he is not a member. Now, he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian, St. Athanasius, St. Augustine, St. Jerome, and others. Therefore, the manifest heretic cannot be Pope." -- St. Robert Bellarmine

    Offline Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 16477
    • Reputation: +4866/-1803
    • Gender: Female
    the vortex
    « Reply #19 on: February 17, 2015, 04:07:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Who is Terry Carroll?  What is his background?
    Is he a cradle Catholic or a convert?  

    I don't trust anyone. (Except Archbishop Lefebvre. )

    I like to use the Vortex videos to reach out to many family and friends who can relate.

    I think Catholic media needs to work together instead of tearing each other apart.
    While they are going back and forth, Christians are being slaughtered.

    It is a sin against God to declare the SSPX schismatics when
    Many bishops and cardinals are the true schismatics.  



    May God bless you and keep you


    Offline Petertherock

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 673
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    the vortex
    « Reply #20 on: February 19, 2015, 07:39:26 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If the SSPX is in schism then why does the Vatican say the matter of the SSPX is an internal Church matter? Why is it when people confess a sin that has caused ex-communication when they write to Rome as required they always get a reply back stating it was a valid confession and they just comment on whether the penance was appropriate or too lenient or to strict? If the SSPX was in schism then wouldn't Rome write back stating the confession was illicit and invalid?

    Watch these videos...