.
You're probably asking for the content of the Third Secret. But that
has been suppressed by the same perpetrators who have foisted
Vat.II upon the whole Church. And the reason that's the case is that
if we were to know the content of the Third Secret we would know
that Vat.II is a can of worms. So of course, the advocates of Vat.II,
such as PEB16, would be bent on suppressing such problematic
pronouncements of Our Lady!
It's a bit surreal to see Pope Francis practically dragging PEB16 into
chapels dedicated to Our Lady to pray. It's as if PEB16 wouldn't
have ever gone there on his own, but now he goes there in order
to appease his successor, somehow.
At La Salette, France (1846), Our Lady said that
Rome would
lose the faith and become the seat of the Antichrist. But there
are not a few so-called defenders of the Faith today who deny that
she ever said that. There was at first Church approval of La Salette,
which included that sentence, but some years later, a kind of
backtracking happened and an 'updated' version came out that was
curiously missing that one sentence.
Regarding Fatima (1917, 1925, 1929), Freemasons have tried to
suppress the entire thing.
The message of Akita, Japan has not received much notice, even
though all the key elements of authenticity are there, including the
fact that the local bishop approved it. And that happened in 1973.
You don't have to be a Freemason to be complicit in helping them
to achieve their goals. They have quite a history of spreading their
errors outside of their own ranks, such that even outsiders who have
no regard for Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ or even contempt for them will
nonetheless do their dirty work for them, and that's fine with the
Masons; so long as their ends are achieved, it matters not how it's
done.
You ought to listen to Fr. Hewko's sermon from a few days ago, on
Aug. 3rd, in Boston KY:
post with link to the download.
Topic: The Virgin Mary and Vatican II (Read 1288 times)