.

Before Vatican II, all Catholics believed what the Church taught about Baptism of Desire and Baptism of Blood, which you can find in every pre-Vatican 2 book on the Faith where this subject is treated. The only people who did not accept this were a small group of a few dozen crazy weirdos in a small town in Massachusetts and the one, excommunicated priest whom they followed. And that was only a decade or two before Vatican 2, and continued afterwards. Before the 1940s, or 1930s at the earliest, their ideas had been unheard of in nearly 2000 years of Catholic tradition.

I am responding to humor you, but really, if you want to have a discussion about these ideas, you should respond to the objections people have made to your ideas, including me. You have made little attempt to address much of what I have written.

Perhaps, instead of combative, drive-by questions such as the one I just answered, you could tell us a little about what you believe. For example, do you believe there is anything wrong with Vatican 2? The new Mass? The new code of canon law? Do you have any objection to anything said by any "pope" starting with John XXIII to the present time? What do you think about people who believe the changes in the Church have been an abandonment of the Faith? Do you believe the Vatican 2 teaching on Religious Liberty goes against Quanta Cura and the other encyclicals particularly in the 19th century where the popes condemned religious liberty? Do you believe it was a sin for the post-Vatican 2 "popes" to participate actively in false, heretical, and even pagan worship?