No strawmen here, but....
Somebody pointed out to me the idiocy of your last post, and I really debated to myself whether I should respond, and I will respond with more truth. Strawman "Croix"alist says
...no heart for supporting an openly anti-Catholic regime...
Modern Russia is not opposed to Catholicism, rather they're opposed to the NWO Conciliar church that is a wolf in sheep's clothing, aligning her harlot self, behind closed doors, with war-mongering, zionist, usurious, culturally marxist, anti-Christ nations in the EU, and the US and Israel, while she spews typical abstract rhetoric with positive connotations, such as, "we must return to peace", designed to make herself look "righteous" to the many novus ordo catholics, and others in the West, who are lost in their diabolical disorientation.
As for the rest of what you wrote in that paragraph, it needs no response because it's non substantive, illogical drivel packaged to make you sound "right". Another utter FAIL. Strawman "Croix"alist says
Hegelian dialectic is the term commonly referred to describe the use of thesis/antithesis/synthesis. It's not associated with anything else. Did you think you invented it yourself and can apply it willy-nilly? You then tried to pull back and use "antithesis" as simply an opposite of pre-1991 Soviet Russia (never mind the fact you actually went through the trouble to outline your Hegelian framework for it) and still fall flat on your face.You
were the one who tried conflating Hegelian dialectic with my use of "antithesis" (which is Russia) to the former Soviet Union. I used that term independently
from Hegelian dialectic, but you, in your deceptive strawman argumentation, tried to bait me by declaring who was the thesis, and thus, what could be the synthesis? Naturally, anyone with some degree of cognition could see the answers to that (baited) question, but I answered the obvious anyway, and my answer was not in regard to a Hegelian dialectic. It was merely saying Russia is the antithesis of Soviet Union because the former promotes Our Lord, while the latter denied Him openly (thesis), and thus the synthesis can be the genesis of more God-loving and God-fearing people again in Russia. Moreover, these words and concepts - thesis, antithesis, synthesis - are NOT
exclusive to Hegelian dialectic.
You lose, again. Strawman "Croix"alist says
Fatima ought to be your litmus test.
I believe in Fatima. However, Catholics are not obligated to believe any apparition, rather these few apparitions are deemed by the Church to be believable, and contain no errors that contradict, nor could be harmful to, the Faith. Moreover, and again, Our Lady never
specified how long "Russia will spread her errors". Your problem is you have a preconceived notion about what Our Lady was warning the world.
And perhaps when this warning, apropos to Russia, comes to fruition, but doesn't match your little mind's preconceived notion, then you won't believe it. That is lack of Faith on your part!
Objectively, we can see Russia has already spread those errors (see by previous comment), which includes infiltration of the U.S. and using the whore America as a proxy. Strawman "Croix"alist says
You think Russia and Israel are sworn enemies?
They sure aren't allies. Even back in the 60s of the Soviet Union, decades after Stalin was the biggest proponent of "Israel's" creation, they began to be at odds with each other, as reflected by a Soviet ship witnessing Israel attacking the USS Liberty, and when Israel realized they were spotted by the Soviets, they halted finishing the attack. Alas, almost 40 American sailors were still murdered by the perfidious jews, whose impetus for the attacks was to blame Egypt or Jordan, thus draw the U.S. into the war.
And it's Putin's Russia who saved Syria from being overrun by Israeli (and U.S./Saudi) backed Muhammadan extremists, thus the Christian minority in Syria, who have always had protection by the Assads, were saved from being pillaged and raped.
Look, buddy, why don't you go to "Catholic"Answers and seek out some fellow neocon anti-Russia bigoted slobs, and maybe you all can have a slumber party while you watch Red Dawn and stroke each others' confirmation bias.
By the way, are you some sort of perverted masochist? You seem to enjoy being destroyed every time in this polemic. :surprised: Nevermind, don't answer... Anyway, to conclude this most truthful rebuttal which essentially annihilates your logical fallacies and lies, take heed to what Bishop Williamson says about modern day Russia and the possibility of Moscow becoming the 3rd Rome !