I notice this term being tossed around this ENTIRE forum lately; "Dogmatic Sedevacantists" and frankly I admit I am confused with the definition of it. I think different people here have different ideas of what it actually means.
What does it mean to you or are you just posting the term because ... it is popular to do so?
My own definition of the term means if you are not a sede when you die you are ripe for Hell, no doubt about it. Who here says that?
The only Dogmatic Sedevacantist I know of would be the Dimond people, or another example of "Dogmatic Hellbound judging" fits the Feeneyites position.
To explain sedevacantism or to defend it is not being Dogmatic! I think others like to toss it around because they feel guilty about some issue they do not want to face.
Maybe this post is taking this thread in a different direction but it still fits the Title of the thread.
The dogmatic sedevacantists, like LoE and even yourself for example...
I refer to my post above. Stubborn is probably the most ardent and disgusting dogmatic anti-sedevacantist and dogmatic Feeneyite on the forum. His lack of charity has very few rivals.
And here I remember you saying that you don't even read what I post anyway, so you wouldn't know any more than LoE would know.
If you would ever accept the challenge and actually reply to my posts (which you said you don't even read) or answer some questions one of these days, you'd find yourself to be the disgusting one thank you very much.
Always remember, every pope the Church has ever had is and always was, a dogmatic anti-sedevacantist, I'd say while you think it disgusting, I'd say that's a pretty good group to be a part of.
The proof is in your reply - same old non-answer the post, just shoot the messenger - - -same o same o typical dogmatic sedevacantist reply.
Topic: The SSPX - Resistance is superior to sedevacantism (Read 25842 times)