...I didn't even mention Pope Benedict XVI. I didn't even say his work produced a lot of good fruit either, which it has not indeed sadly...
No, but you pointed to sedevacantism's "lack of good fruit" in a way that made it plain you were leaning upon this "evidence" to support the idea that is must, therefore, be incorrect.
This makes it most sensible to make inquiry about the "good fruit" of those you are espousing as "true": BXVI et alii.
Let us get something straight:
I oppose the Novus Ordo and those who certainly brought it to us (and presently direct it). I oppose the body AND the head.
You oppose the body, but you accept the head.
How well do you think it would go if you allowed a poisonous snake's head into your tent, but not his body? Not well, as you accept the body, at least
in potentia, when you accept the head - they are ONE.
The issue is NOT about one man - it is about an entire counterfeit society. If the one man is the HEAD of an unquestionably counterfeit society, how is he - AT THE SAME TIME - the head of Holy Church? Such is an impossibility.
If you reject the counterfeit body, as you do, then reject the head thereof. Quit playing around, for the poison from the snake is diffused
through the head.