Oh, so you finally admit it! You finally admit you follow Bergoglio! I’m curious however, in what way do you follow him?

Lack of logic on your part prevents any logical dialogue. Obviously, you will not allow anyone to disagree with you. That's how it is with dogmatic sedes and sedeprivationists. It's a type of sedevacantist supremacy which believes that it must dominate all others. 

Since the priests and bishops after V2 see that Rome doesn't appear to be Catholic, then they will perform Catholic sacraments in an "emergency state".  This means the Faithful, who can't find a "true priest" will ask to be provided one to perform all needed Sacraments in a state of emergency without jurisdiction.  If they need a priest, they have to ask a bishop to help get them one, because a "true Bishop" can only make "true priests".  This is what we base our ideas on to justify being outside of Rome.  I know I don't have the most perfect words to explain this, but the Faithful are required to ask for the Sacraments and the Priests should provide them, regardless of what the "true theological position is", because we do not have an authority to tell us which of us are right and which of us are wrong.

Period end of story. 

All of the groups outside of Rome are continuing the Catholic Church in this way, but they spend more time fighting over "unapproved theological positions" and less time making sure all of the Faithful are getting the sacraments they need.  It shouldn't be that I have access to 5 priests (all with different positions) and some have no priests.  And the Faithful should accept all "true priests" regardless of differences in these "unapproved theological positions" because the "True Sacraments" bring down graces that we need for the spiritual battle we are currently fighting.

You said you need help, Gray, but clearly you have your opinion all worked out, along with the husband you said you must follow.
However, it is abundantly clear that you are here as an apologist for the sedevacantist position. Why pretend otherwise?

That's the difference between sedevacantists and non-sedevacantists. When one believes that the most important thing that he or she can do is to get everyone to be a sedevacantist, then there's going to be a problem

Amen, Meg! I've been told I'm outside the Church, on the road to Hell... by people who espoused the same position as I for decades... evidently they didn't have the Faith until they became sedevacantist.

Of course they are not all of this persuasion, but they certainly have an over-representation of such people.

I for one would be happy to fight modernism and not each other.

But what can I do when the sedevacantists believe that I do not have the right to believe that I cannot follow a heretical Pope? They believe that I cannot be allowed to believe that a heretical pope can be a Pope. How do you propose to deal with that?

I actually think that we shouldnt focus on that argument, because the main argument is inside Rome vs outside Rome.  Most of us here are outside Rome.  We need not worry about what others think or if we think the same.  We should encourage each other to do what we know to be true and Catholic.  Go to valid Masses, keep ourselves in a state of Grace, pray the Rosary, beg God to fix this with prayer and penances.  We have so much real practical stuff we can do that we shouldn't keep fighting each other.  The sceme of the devil is to keep this going, because he knows his days are numbered if we stop fighting each other.

Fine, but please enlighten this forum on how you follow Bergoglio?

Meg is just trying to figure things out like the rest of us.  This type of reply just puts people on the defensive and then ends conversations.

Exactly, you are a sedevacantist apologist, why did you appear on here feigning desire for advice when in fact you just want to give it?

Proof?  I never preached one side or the other.  I want men to stand up and stop continuing the arguments they cant solve.  I am tired of sitting on the sideline and watching it happen.  You seem to be so wrapped up in attacking people.  Why?

Exactly, you are a sedevacantist apologist, why did you appear on here feigning desire for advice when in fact you just want to give it?

Really?  That's not how she has come across to me.

You’re new here. I tried that approach several times with her, to no avail. She is an unreasonable, illogical, irrational, dogmatic anti-sedevacantist. If you take an hour and read through he anti sedevacantist rants you will see that I’m on the mark.

I think she is just frustrated with the mean things, sedevacantists keep saying to her.  I don't know. I don't know her personally.