Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Canonizations Not Always Infallible?  (Read 7212 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline overmind

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 60
  • Reputation: +31/-2
  • Gender: Male
Canonizations Not Always Infallible?
« Reply #75 on: April 26, 2014, 01:38:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Neil Obstat
    Quote from: claudel
    Quote from: Charlemagne
    Quote from: TheKnightVigilant
    Andy, what do you think about the JPII cross collapsing upon and killing a man three days before these false canonizations?

    Give him time to search for some nonapplicable prooftexts.


    He won't need much. His patron, Saint Internet,* will give him a few thousand words of private revelation in a matter of minutes.



    Here's what andysloan should be looking for:  

    Marco Gusmini died a 'martyr' because, well, he died.  According to Newchurch everyone who dies is a martyr, and you won't have to look hard to back that up.  

    Therefore, this cross-falling event (it wasn't a crucifix because it had no INRI on top, which is necessary for every crucifix to have or else it's just a cross) was a thing that 'sanctified' the Newcanonizations of both JPII (who was commemorated in the cross monument that collapsed and killed Mr. Gusmini) and John XXIII (because Gusmini had been living on a street named after John XXIII), by producing a new martyr for the
    'church'.  

    See for yourself:  there is no INRI on the top of this cross:  




    The sculptor Enrico Job most likely felt the INRI would be unnecessarily cluttering to his otherwise minimalist work of whatever-it-is.  


    .


    I knew it reminded me of something.