Correct me if I am wrong, but you're a proponent of R&Rism, no? If you do not hold to R&Rism, I digress.

If I'm honest I don't really have a pin point belief, for me its touch and go as i just want to find valid sacrament for my own soul and I see merits in R&R and Sede Positions. At the end of the day if youre a priest Ordained via a Valid +Thuc , +Mendez or +Lefebvre Line, whether Non Una cuм or not I will be happy man knowing I will have non-doubtful sacraments.

It is good to honest.

But your answer brings up a few ancillary questions for me:

The orthos have valid Eucharist, right?

So, validity alone shouldn't really be your concern.

The orthos don't have either;

A) the Catholic Faith, or
B) ordinary jurisdiction (necessary to forgive sins, perform sacramentally blessed marriages, licitly confect the Eucharist, preach, etc.)

So, outside danger of death, what you are really "happy to know" is what you hope is a man with BOTH valid orders and jurisdiction

The Trad clergy purport to operate on a mixture of supplied jurisdiction and epikeia.

Prior to supplied jurisdiction being added to the 1917 code, it was an area of theological dispute - i.e., if it was possible, when, how, to whom, etc. And, how it was added to the code in no way suffices to exonerate the great liberties the Trad clergy have taken reading into it to "fit" the present crisis - IMO. How they are using supplied jurisdiction in an ordinary way is really just a private opinion of theirs and anyone who chooses to "use" them as "Sacrament mills" subscribes to their opinion. It is an opinion that would have severe consequences IF that opinion were wrong. Just more speculation. Just because I want something to be true, doesn't make it to true. No one can hold it dogmatically that the Trad clergy actually have the use of supplied jurisdiction in an ordinary way, the way they claim, and if you cannot hold it as dogmatically certain - then there is doubt. Everyone wants valid Sacraments. That Sacraments must have validity is dogma but having the necessary jurisdiction to confect/offer them is dogma too. Perhaps I will go back and dig up some old threads about this (as it is probable to get someone's panties in bunch).

All the above aside, when you say you're "touch n go" about it - do you mean you're just undecided on whether Jorge is the pope? If you are then would not "a doubtful pope is no pope" be what you really believe? Who the pope is or isn't is a dogmatic fact, so one has an obligation to resolve the doubt in their own intellect, No? Not trying to be pushy, just trying to get a feel for where you are at.

This "every Catholic layman needs to pore over and analyze Canon Law and countless theological opinions in order to properly practice the Catholic faith" is a bunch of hogwash and, quite frankly, potentially harmful to the faith. This is an unprecedented crisis and the faithful should be encouraged to receive the sacraments, which are necessary for salvation, from Catholic priests wherever they can be found..whether that be sedevacantist, independent, SSPX, Resistance, Eastern Catholic, etc.

What sacraments are necessary for salvation (strictly speaking)?

I'm not well read enough to get into necessity of means/precept, absolute/relative necessity..but Trent anathematizes those who say the sacraments are not necessary for salvation. At the very least Baptism would be absolutely necessary in order to be saved, for example in the case of infants, the retarded, a deathbed convert

That is NOT what the Christ nor his Church teaches. They must be "sent" (authorized/jurisdiction), otherwise we are obligated to hold them in suspicion and treat them as "thieves and robbers" John 10:1

Viewed in that light, it could be argued that taking a nonchalant, one-size-sacramental-shoe-fits-all to those who have not been duly authorized to perform sacred functions is what may be harmful. It is all in the realm of speculation, and one opinion vs. another. The only fallback is Church teaching, but even then, without a pope to arbitrate these disputes, no resolution can be expected.

Right, in ordinary times I could not receive the sacraments from a priest who is not a part of a diocese or a canonically recognized religious order or whatever else..I'm obviously not arguing that I could, and you know that. When you have a worldwide apostasy of both the churchmen and laity I would reckon a guess that some restrictions regarding jurisdiction, faculties, authority might be dispensed with because "salus animarum suprema lex"..the salvation of souls is the supreme law of the Church

Actually, that in essence is what it is - saying the man holds the office of pope, but he is impeded from exercising it due to his lack of, [supply whatever you like, i.e, the Catholic faith, interior proper dispositions to accept the duties, him being a doubtful priest/bishop etc.]

Sadly, IMO, it offers no solution but rather compounds the problem because it would essentially divide the papacy much in the same way that the new ecclesiology would divide the Church (Soul & Body). Just like God is one, so is everything else that flows from Him i.e., the faith, the Church, the papacy, the priesthood, etc. For all intents and purposes, it is R&R on roids.

There is even a video by a Totalist video positing that "The Thesis" is Modernism veiled.

Interesting "thesis" (no pun intended)
Is the Thesis a form of Neo-Modernism?
I agree with you 100%. But this is poll is built around a niche theological topic part sacramental, part moral, part dogmatic, part Canon Law. I am interested to see what answer(s) one can provide to that allows for separating the Bishopric of Rome from the papacy.

I don't see a satisfatory solution with any of the theories. Sedevacantism, The Thesis, or R&R. 

All things the same, if we consider that a cleric that only has the minor orders, or even a layman is elected Pope. What is his status in the time between the election and his ordination and consecration? Pope elect? Does he have any power at all before he receives Holy Orders? Is he "half Pope"? I have read some post around that tend to this idea.