Author Topic: The Novus Ordo sect is the Whore of Babylon (Read 799 times)

Matto · « **Reply #1 on:** August 25, 2013, 03:24:45 PM »

Don't the Dimond brothers say that John Paul II was the Antichrist?

Cathedra · « **Reply #2 on:** August 25, 2013, 03:31:03 PM »

Quote from: Matto

Don't the Dimond brothers say that John Paul II was the Antichrist?

They do, and they also ridiculously say that Benny is the False Prophet, which is all laughable, but i believe they happen to be right on this, i mean, read the passages! That is the Novus Ordo church right there.

TCat · « **Reply #3 on:** August 25, 2013, 04:29:35 PM »

Dubious question:
Are the dim0n6 brothers the 2 witnesses to the Apocalypse? LOL

Cathedra · « **Reply #4 on:** August 25, 2013, 04:35:08 PM »

Quote from: TCat

Dubious question:
Are the dim0n6 brothers the 2 witnesses to the Apocalypse? LOL

No, that would be RJMI who claims that title.

ThomisticPhilosopher · « **Reply #5 on:** August 28, 2013, 05:01:56 PM »

Mr. Ibryani is probably the most radical schismatic that I have ever seen. He says that he is "investigating" Gregory XVI. Vatican I was an invalid Council, Pius IX is most likely an apostate "anti-Pope" and it goes without saying that he sees his Guardian Angel. He happens to be way too much into private prophecy.

Now whether anti-Pope John Paul II was the one and only real anti-Christ. I would say no, but he might be the beast.

It has been a little while since I have actually re-visited that topic. So maybe some of you out there that might be more aware might be able to help me with this. Please cite your sources, it goes without saying I don't accept dubious claims.

What is the difference between the false prophet, the beast and the Anti-Christ. What is their timeline order between them? I appreciate it, thanks.