Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: The Newspeak of Vatican II - its baneful effects  (Read 1551 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Neil Obstat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18177
  • Reputation: +8276/-692
  • Gender: Male
The Newspeak of Vatican II - its baneful effects
« on: June 12, 2012, 01:17:32 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • [Traditionally called Sunday Within the Octave of Corpus Christi
    - which you'll find in missals printed before 1954, such as
    the New Roman Missal of Fr. Lasance of 1945; updated versions
    in print have also pages with additional Feast Days, Masses and
    prayers amended with appropriate developments that came after
    that time, such as the Assumption (dogma defined in 1950),
    St. Isidore the Farmer, Pope St. Pius X, etc. This is an advantage
    over using the 1962 missals which already are missing certain things,
    such as many of the octaves of Feast Days, that were taken out of
    the liturgy as part of the first wave of modernization that would
    culminate in the abominable, Masonic Novus Ordo liturgy
    which leaves little but faint reflections of the ancient liturgy that
    it replaced so unceremoniously. Pope Pius XII is guilty of starting
    this process, including his appointment to high office of the
    demolition agent himself, Annibale Bugnini, the Freemason.]











    Dear Friends,
     
    My sermon for Sunday, June 10, 2012, is attached.
     
    God's Blessings,
    Fr. Campbell
     

    Sunday after Corpus Christi, June 10, 2012
    The “Newspeak” of Vatican II

     

    On the Sunday after Corpus Christ we are celebrating the mystery of the Holy Eucharist, pondering the words of Our Lord: “Amen, amen I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man, and drink his blood, you shall not have life in you” (Jn. 6:54). Jesus speaks not of the natural life shared by every descendent of Adam and Eve, but of the supernatural life, the spiritual life, the life that comes with Sanctifying Grace through Baptism. We are sons of God by adoption, sharing His life through grace. We are made holy, united in a holy union with the angels and the saints. We are alive! And this life is sustained in us by eating the Bread of Life in the Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist. This life is not given to those who have refused the Lord’s invitation to the Wedding Feast.

     

    The natural man knows nothing of this life. After Jesus offered His disciples His flesh to eat and His Blood to drink many of them walked away. Jesus explained to the Apostles, “This is why I have said to you, ‘no one can come to me unless he is enabled to do so by my Father’” (Jn. 6:66). When He asked the twelve if they would also leave, Peter answered: “Lord, to whom shall we go? Thou hast words of everlasting life, and we have come to believe and to know that thou art the Christ, the Son of God” (Jn. 6:69,70).

     

    The Apostles had faith, but the natural man, the man without faith, cannot understand the things of the spirit. Those who do not have faith are like zombies, who do not know they are dead. Not only do they not understand spiritual things, but they oppose them, persecuting the children of God. As Jesus says, “He who is not with me is against me; and he who does not gather with me scatters” (Lk. 11:23).

     

    The natural man plans our lives for us – our education, our family life, our work, our clothing, our leisure, our entertainment. We can no longer even think for ourselves, because he has also taken command of the language, “dumbing it down”, and loading it with words and phrases that disguise the greatest evil as something good, phrases like “pro choice”. Does a woman have a right to choose to kill her unborn child? The Lord’s Commandment says: “Thou shalt not kill!” The child in the womb is a precious human being who may someday be led to the Font of Baptism and be fed with the Bread of Life. But those who can’t get beyond the words “pro choice” cannot see the truth. Those who control our language control our thoughts.

     

    Over sixty years ago George Orwell wrote his prophetic novel, “1984.” In 1948 he wrote an appendix in which he explained the principles of “Newspeak”, the language which, in the novel, was being created to replace traditional English, which was being abandoned in the new world of English Socialism (IngSoc): “The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of IngSoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible. It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought – that is, a thought diverging from the principles of IngSoc – should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words.” The great works of English literature would have to be translated into Newspeak, a task which “meant that no book written before approximately 1960 could be translated as a whole” (The Principles of Newspeak, newspeakdictionary.com).

     

    “George Orwell saw not only the poverty but the danger of a language that had become purely contemporary. A language without roots, without the authority of generations implicit in its usages, is the perfect instrument for tyranny” (Joe Sobran, We’re Losing Shakespeare).

     

    Does mention of the year “1960” ring a bell? In that year preparations were in progress for the planned revolutionary council, Vatican II, which specialized in “doublespeak.” It would rewrite Church history and doctrine, downplaying practically everything written before 1960, and imposing the Church’s variety of Newspeak upon unsuspecting Catholics throughout the world. As a result, most Catholics who follow the Newchurch speak a new impoverished language which renders them incapable of understanding traditional Catholicism. No longer able to think for themselves, they have become the brainwashed drones of Orwell’s novel.



     Who has done this? God knows who they are, and they must face His judgment. Jesus speaks of those who have been the cause of scandal: “But whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it were better for him to have a great millstone hung around his neck, and to be drowned in the depths of the sea. Woe to the world because of scandals! For it must needs be that scandals come, but woe to the man through whom scandal does come!” (Mt. 18:6,7).

     

    And are we going to let them do this to us? How about a little righteous indignation against those who are harassing our souls! There is a place for just anger – not the irrational anger that causes us to lose control of ourselves and strike out at someone – but righteous anger, Godly anger. Should we not be angry when confronted with their odious work – their ridicule, their lies, their blasphemies, their allurements, their seductions, their lewd performances, their satanic music, their places of carnal delights? Are we going to let them destroy our souls? That moral monster at the other end of the shameful image that flashes upon our computer screen is no friend, but an agent of Hell. May St. Michael and the Heavenly Armies strike at such and send them reeling into the bottomless pit where they belong!

     

    But we have true friends with whom we share a spiritual language which is hidden from the worldly. That language is prayer. We can call upon Holy Mary, the Mother of God, to go to war for us against the Dragon, and upon a host of Heavenly Angels and Saints to pray without ceasing for our victory over the powers of Hell.

     

    The Lord feeds us with His greatest gift, the Hidden Manna, the Bread from Heaven, the food alone of those who accept His invitation to the Wedding Feast: “Lo! Upon the altar lies, Hidden deep from human eyes, Bread of angels from the skies, made the food of mortal man… Thou who feedest us below! Source of all we have and know! Grant that with Thy saints above, Sitting at the feast of love, we may see Thee face to face. Amen. Alleluia” (St. Thomas Aquinas, Sequence of Corpus Christi).
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.


    Offline Sede Catholic

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1306
    • Reputation: +1038/-6
    • Gender: Male
    • PRAY "...FOR THE CHURCH OF DARKNESS TO LEAVE ROME"
    The Newspeak of Vatican II - its baneful effects
    « Reply #1 on: October 04, 2012, 01:56:21 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Fascinating.
    Francis is an Antipope. Pray that God will grant us a good Pope and save the Church.
    I abjure and retract my schismatic support of the evil CMRI.Thuc condemned the Thuc nonbishops
    "Now, therefore, we declare, say, determine and pronounce that for every human creature it is necessary for salvation to be subject to the authority of the Roman Pontiff"-Pope Boniface VIII.
    If you think Francis is Pope,do you treat him like an Antipope?
    Pastor Aeternus, and the Council of Trent Sessions XXIII and XXIV


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    The Newspeak of Vatican II - its baneful effects
    « Reply #2 on: October 04, 2012, 02:35:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Fr. Campbell seems to steer clear of the SSPX shenanigans, but I must say,
    his words here hang pretty tight to a denunciation of the ambiguity of the
    Neo-SSPX evolutionary language as found today coming from Fr. Rostand, Fr.
    Couture and Bishop Fellay, among others (not necessarily in that order).

    If +ABL were here to comment, I'm sure his words would be much stronger...

    I really don't want to morph this into an SSPX-Rome Agreement sub-forum thread,
    but it's hard to keep the two distinguished here.
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline nadieimportante

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 771
    • Reputation: +496/-0
    • Gender: Male
    The Newspeak of Vatican II - its baneful effects
    « Reply #3 on: October 04, 2012, 11:12:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The language of Vatican II, language used to confuse rather than to communicate. It is easy to spot for those who are not seeking teachers to confirm their own desires.

    Here's a good example:

    CCC1261- As regards children who have died without Baptism, the Church can only entrust them to the mercy of God, as she does in her funeral rites for them. Indeed, the great mercy of God who desires that all men should be saved, and Jesus' tenderness toward children which caused him to say: "Let the children come to me, do not hinder them,"64 allow us to hope that there is a way of salvation for children who have died without Baptism. All the more urgent is the Church's call not to prevent little children coming to Christ through the gift of holy Baptism.

    Practically every Novus Ordite brings it up as proof that aborted infants go to heaven. Yet, if you read it carefully, it does not say they go to heaven. It does not really say anything. It just says we entrust them to God's mercy. That does not answer the question where do they go. Scarcely any Novus Ordite sees this.
    "Wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it.
     Right is right even if no one is doing it." - Saint Augustine

    Offline stevusmagnus

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3728
    • Reputation: +825/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    The Newspeak of Vatican II - its baneful effects
    « Reply #4 on: October 05, 2012, 08:45:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    It does not really say anything.


    You've just discovered the secret of all VCII writings.


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    The Newspeak of Vatican II - its baneful effects
    « Reply #5 on: October 06, 2012, 02:31:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: stevusmagnus
    Quote
    It does not really say anything.


    You've just discovered the secret of all VCII writings.


    There is a logical proof of this postulate.

    In order for a proposition to have meaning, it must be understandable in
    one way, and a contradictory interpretation must be impossible.  E.g., "The
    sun is shining."  Why? This cannot be true if it is midnight.  E.g., "The
    answer to this true/false question on the quiz is "true." Therefore, a false
    answer cannot be correct. This is how the tests are scored and the
    students' grades are possible to record in a ledger.  Otherwise, it's chaos.  

    Ambiguity is the hallmark of Vat.II writings/docuмents.  This has been the
    primary accusation and the principal proposition that has been indefensible.  

    For example, when someone comes out with a specific criticism of V.II docs,
    in cases where Vatican officials respond (they often have no response and
    their silence itself is revealing), they turn the page or pages to another
    part of the V.II docs, where some other treatment of the same subject has
    wording that can more easily be interpreted in an opposite manner, and they
    only comment on that, saying, look, see how traditional Vat.II really is.

    Of course, whenever some new, liberal policy is being practiced, only the
    most liberal leaning texts are referred to, so as to defend the liberalism of
    the policy.

    Now, take ambiguity per se.  In the most extreme cases, words that
    are most ambiguous can be interpreted in one way that is in accord with
    traditional principles, but they can also be interpreted in an opposite way
    which is in accord with Modernist principles. To the extent that any
    ambiguous statement can be legitimately interpreted in two opposite
    ways, it is therefore of no meaning whatsoever,
    as mutual
    exclusiveness renders a proposition without meaning.

    Since Vat.II docuмents are ambiguous throughout, they are therefore
    entirely meaningless.
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.