CathInfo.com

"Then, in 2011, Fr. John Corapi, perhaps the single biggest celebrity in EWTN's history, was removed from the network after an investigative panel appointed by his order alleged continuing sɛҳuąƖ improprieties, drug abuse, and a lavish lifestyle contrary to his vow of poverty (to which the order, it must be said, had previously failed to object). As I noted in a column for The Remnant, in response to the report Corapi "issued an evasive non-denial and purported to 'resign' from the priesthood rather than contest the charges against him. 'That era of my life is sadly ended,' he said, speaking of his sacred priesthood as if it were a job opportunity that had reached an unfortunate dead end." I further noted that "Shortly thereafter Corapi appeared in a video on his [now defunct] website wearing a leather Harley Davidson jacket, his head shaven and his gray beard dyed black, to announce that he would pursue an Internet career under the bizarre moniker 'Black SheepDog."


I don't believe Fr Corapi admitted to anything and accused one of his previous employees (female) of false accusation and sensationalism, maybe even in an attempt to shake his ministry down for money, I don't know. But he said for years he was marked by the liberals and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs in the Church and they would eventually take him down, which they did. there still hasn't been any real closure to this saga and the good father has been silent for the better part of a year now, maybe in obedience to his superiors, again, I don't know.

I actually liked Fathers style when I first seen him on his old Catechism series years ago but I think the fame, success, and money might have tempted him into backsliding into his old ways, he was of course a "shrewd" business man back in his "bad old days" before his recovery back into the Church and evetually the ministry. I'm personally hoping he comes out vindicated from this scandal, but it doesn't look good at this point.

The whole "Black Sheep dog" thing was just bizarre.

How quickly trads and 'conservative' Catholics eat their young. When a conservative NO or trad figure has any sort  of notoriety and is accused of impropriety, the denunciations are pretty quick.

Have you  ever heard  of a  setup??

A  couple of these figures mentioned  (maybe more) besides  Corapi even have  said they'd   eventually get  taken  down.  But, in their naivete,  they seemed to expect the beenfit of  the doubt by  right-minded Catholics, or people that listened to their homilies to  recall their prediction of a takedown and see through it. It doesn't seem to happen, even when a guy  'told you so'.

I'm not saying this is always the case,  or that  these people are always above reproach, but they  paint a serious target on their back  when they get  *serious* about prolife  ministry,  start naming  names,  talking about the enormous money  behind it, mentioned the actual  supernatural evil behind it and its wealthy supporters, and the USCCB's  complicity such as  the CCHR or  the  CRS donating  to  abortion providers, 'family planning' or birth control pushers.

Alinsky himself discussed the tactic of getting the  opposition to "eat their young", especially  when the opposition identity is circuмscribed by some moral stance (as opposed to ethnic or other):  Get them to hold themselves to their own standards while you flout them.

So, while they go on pushing  infanticide and setting  the agenda in mainstream  society, the news, academia, defining  what passes  for 'polite' conversation, we collectively rip  to shreds and cast out anyone who exhibits human weakness and makes a mistake (let's contextualize drug abuse, it's not murdering millions of babies, let's contextualize a priest having consensual heterosɛҳuąƖ sex with an adult woman like Fr. Cutie, it's not murdering millions of babies)  while 'they' carry  on grinding up the bones of a millions babies a year for their bread (a million just in the US!).

If you don't think these forces collude, you're a jackass. Pedophiles supported (and continue to) each other in the clerical ranks for probably 50 years and hid each other, all the way up to bishops. No accusations of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity or pederasty, and if there were, they didn't stick. If you promote the TLM, oppose gαy  marriage in a serious way, or pay more than lip  service to prolife efforts (the USCCB *talks* a lot about 'life') and piss of potential donors or expose the h0Ɩ0cαųst of innocents that is being stood by idly by much of the hierarchy who should be leading the charge, then mysteriously all sorts of accusations and accusers, and insinuations of impropriety start to emerge, and ironically the lavender mafia hangs the dreaded pederasty albatross around your neck and people who were demonstrably  not living in the  country at the time some good priest ostensibly abused him start speaking out and piling on.

A few, a very, very few recant once in awhile and describe large (to them) cash payments to  them in exchange for such tall tales and the press is completely uninterested-- they love nothing better than the salaciousness of the prolife, or anti gαy marriage priest getting 'outed' as a self hating gαy.

Consider that by piling on without *knowing* what really happened (and how can you *know?), you are part of the problem.

The case of Fr Euteneur is possibly a set-up. He may been getting a bit too explicit about the main perpetrators of the pro-death industries.

The founder of HLI , Fr Paul Marx, was made a prisoner because he started wondering out loud.

had dinner w/Marx a few weeks prior to his death, largely in a wheelchair and not too mobile and I heard, none to cognitive....age and infirmity sadly...

Euteneur attacked Fox "news", Hannity and others, then poof, he is in trouble.......no hard to connect dots........