Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: The Impossibility of Sedevacantism  (Read 13326 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AnthonyPadua

  • Supporter
Re: The Impossibility of Sedevacantism
« Reply #70 on: November 04, 2023, 08:03:40 PM »
There's no overreacting to your having promoted a schismatic/heretic as having raised questions that have not been answered by Traditional Catholics.  You would be accounted as suspect of heresy for doing that.  This is no light matter or some casual post.  If you don't think heresy is a big deal and objecting to it is overreacting, then you're more suspect than before this post.  Pontrello has raised no good points ... it's all trash.  Sure, maybe the Church was overreacting in putting heretics to death too.  Heresy is no triviality, and it's worse than bodily murder.

Pontrello is just another run-of-the-mill schismatic and heretic.


Just reading the title "why... supports eastern orthodoxy" yikes.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: The Impossibility of Sedevacantism
« Reply #71 on: November 04, 2023, 09:27:09 PM »
Just reading the title "why... supports eastern orthodoxy" yikes.

He's been pushing and promoting Eastern Orthodoxy for years now.

This is the guy that LeDeg claims has been making great points that Trad Catholics haven't addressed (on his blog post from earlier this year):


Uh, yeah.  I'd love to see the Dimonds release a full video ripping this guy to shreds.

He basically opened his foray into Orthodoxy by claiming that Pius IX supported heresy due to his one grossly-misinterpreted mention of "invincible ignorance" (totally buffooning what Pius IX actually wrote) and then denying papal infallibility.  That's his  "unanswered" challenge to Catholicism.

This guy is a joke, and a bad-willed heretic.


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: The Impossibility of Sedevacantism
« Reply #72 on: November 04, 2023, 09:34:09 PM »
Here's another good one:


Of course he's trying to appropriate DR's point as a defense of Orthodoxy, but his dismissal of the distinction between potency and act (which he obviously knows nothing about) for him reduces to "imaginary".  This discredits him immediately.

Analogy is that same as between the body and soul.  Souls in Heaven still have it of their essence to have a body, even though they currently lack one.  This then translates into their having "imaginary" bodies?  What an idiot ... but then heresy does that to people.  They have bodies in potency, thought not currently in act.  This does not mean they have "imaginary" bodies.

:facepalm:

Online Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: The Impossibility of Sedevacantism
« Reply #73 on: November 04, 2023, 10:35:27 PM »
One could also argue that the hierarchy still remains in Traditional circles, with Trad Bishops. 

How does this guy explain the Arian heresy, then?  You had St Athanasius and everyone else was a heretic.  Yet the Church survived.  The only answer is those few priests/bishops who kept the Faith were the hierarchy.

Offline AnthonyPadua

  • Supporter
Re: The Impossibility of Sedevacantism
« Reply #74 on: November 04, 2023, 11:00:49 PM »
He's been pushing and promoting Eastern Orthodoxy for years now.

This is the guy that LeDeg claims has been making great points that Trad Catholics haven't addressed (on his blog post from earlier this year):


Uh, yeah.  I'd love to see the Dimonds release a full video ripping this guy to shreds.

He basically opened his foray into Orthodoxy by claiming that Pius IX supported heresy due to his one grossly-misinterpreted mention of "invincible ignorance" (totally buffooning what Pius IX actually wrote) and then denying papal infallibility.  That's his  "unanswered" challenge to Catholicism.

This guy is a joke, and a bad-willed heretic.
That quote is typical projection by the unorthodox, who were caught forging/altering docuмents in the past. Clearly calumny against the Catholic Church.